Hey everyone,
I'm about to take the PADI dry suit course and doing a bit of reading I've discovered something a bit shocking and would like to confirm the validity of this.
This is a quote from a website outlining the controversy between rec DS and tec diving with a DS:
Can some of the experts please confirm if this is true or not? Also if it is true where exactly in the tec materials does it mention to do it that way instead of the other? Having read this it certainly makes me question if I want to take this course or opt for the NAUI one or SDI one etc.
Is this true? Why the hypocrisy/confusion?
Thanks!
I'm about to take the PADI dry suit course and doing a bit of reading I've discovered something a bit shocking and would like to confirm the validity of this.
This is a quote from a website outlining the controversy between rec DS and tec diving with a DS:
...for the recreational dry suit course, PADI requires students to use the suit as the primary BCD. But if you take a look at their technical diving course materials, youll notice that PADI tells technical diving students they should put only enough air in their suit to prevent suit squeeze and keep warm. Then use their BCD/wing as a primary buoyancy device. This is the way you should do it, BTW. Why the two methods, PADI? Why not have the students learn the right way from the beginning?
Can some of the experts please confirm if this is true or not? Also if it is true where exactly in the tec materials does it mention to do it that way instead of the other? Having read this it certainly makes me question if I want to take this course or opt for the NAUI one or SDI one etc.
Is this true? Why the hypocrisy/confusion?
Thanks!