DevonDiver
N/A
Hey guys... heard what you said. I was probably a little curt with the reply, sorry about that. I didn't have the time to provide my normal standard of in-depth consideration.
I think the OP diluted the real concerns raised in his post by covering several different issues, some of which seemed personal (the instructor's girlfriend thing).
The OP is on an internship. Whilst still a paying customer, the idea behind the program is to allow the student to become integrated into the working operations and lifestyle of a dive center. In essense, you become part of the team. You get a 'behind the scenes' insight. That means exposure to the sort of things (personal arguments, relationships etc) that a normal diving customer never gets to see.
It'd be unprofessional to let customers see 'behind the scenes', but it is a fact of life for interns. It sounds like the OP has not yet made the mindset transition from pampered customer to dive worker yet.
I felt the issue about diving with the Thai woman was a little weak. As a trainee DM, I would expect the individual to be fully capable of conducting a dive without supervision (aren't OW divers supposed to do that?). His buddy didn't offer to do a buddy check or agree a plan for the dive. So why didn't he insist on it? Being a dive 'professional' is about taking responsibility for the diving. So... he was given a chance to learn some lessons from that. If he wants his 'hand held' in these situations, then DM is not for him.
I think that it a good sign that the course director concerned provided his trainee DMs with some free diving opportunity, outside of the formatted programme. These dives allow the DMs to take responsibility for themselves, practice their dive leading skills and learn lessons from their own experiences. Not every dive center gives their DMTs these 'extra' dives. They may be called a 'fun dive', but they offer a very real opportunity for learning through the application of the knowledge they have already been given.
I would say that the OP should appreciate the lesson he learnt.... that he failed to take control of the dive preparation, when he felt it wasn't to the appropriate standard. Be aware of this...and don't let it happen again. Have the confidence to say 'no'. when you need to. Have the confidence to take charge.
Sounds to me like this 'fun' dive was very educational.... so stop whinging...
The issue about EFR course standards is worth raising. However, I am confused by his description of the circumstances and problem. There seems to be a lot of assumptions by the OP, that could be based on misunderstanding. As others have suggested, he should contact PADI/EFR ASIA PACIFIC to clarify the situation.
I think the OP diluted the real concerns raised in his post by covering several different issues, some of which seemed personal (the instructor's girlfriend thing).
The OP is on an internship. Whilst still a paying customer, the idea behind the program is to allow the student to become integrated into the working operations and lifestyle of a dive center. In essense, you become part of the team. You get a 'behind the scenes' insight. That means exposure to the sort of things (personal arguments, relationships etc) that a normal diving customer never gets to see.
It'd be unprofessional to let customers see 'behind the scenes', but it is a fact of life for interns. It sounds like the OP has not yet made the mindset transition from pampered customer to dive worker yet.
I felt the issue about diving with the Thai woman was a little weak. As a trainee DM, I would expect the individual to be fully capable of conducting a dive without supervision (aren't OW divers supposed to do that?). His buddy didn't offer to do a buddy check or agree a plan for the dive. So why didn't he insist on it? Being a dive 'professional' is about taking responsibility for the diving. So... he was given a chance to learn some lessons from that. If he wants his 'hand held' in these situations, then DM is not for him.
I think that it a good sign that the course director concerned provided his trainee DMs with some free diving opportunity, outside of the formatted programme. These dives allow the DMs to take responsibility for themselves, practice their dive leading skills and learn lessons from their own experiences. Not every dive center gives their DMTs these 'extra' dives. They may be called a 'fun dive', but they offer a very real opportunity for learning through the application of the knowledge they have already been given.
I would say that the OP should appreciate the lesson he learnt.... that he failed to take control of the dive preparation, when he felt it wasn't to the appropriate standard. Be aware of this...and don't let it happen again. Have the confidence to say 'no'. when you need to. Have the confidence to take charge.
Sounds to me like this 'fun' dive was very educational.... so stop whinging...
The issue about EFR course standards is worth raising. However, I am confused by his description of the circumstances and problem. There seems to be a lot of assumptions by the OP, that could be based on misunderstanding. As others have suggested, he should contact PADI/EFR ASIA PACIFIC to clarify the situation.