you forgot to mention the wanton threat of unadulterated physical violence against the perpetrator. (i didnt even know mr craft sold cans of rodney harrison)
so from what i gather from a couple posters here is that its ok to kiss someone's ***** over a lobster, but not when they vandalize your car while you're diving?
:sofa:
so from what i gather from a couple posters here is that its ok to kiss someone's ***** over a lobster, but not when they vandalize your car while you're diving?
:sofa:
ClassAction:I'll bet the scalding pot of water is more akin to torture (even though recent studies have shown that lobsters don't feel pain). And I have to admit that I find the self-righteousness here (which is admittedly well-intentioned) to be a little crazy. A while ago, I posted a comment asking if there was any wiggle room on the max size. The response was pretty intense. Let's just remember one thing -- the regs are arbitrary to some extent. There has to be a cut off, and 5" must have sounded like a nice round number. Taking a 4.99 inch lobster probably does as much damage as a 5.01 inch lobster, except the latter is illegal. How about taking 15 1-pounders every day? Probably more damage. If you're extremely concerned with preserving the lobster population, don't take any. Am I excusing the taking of a short or a long? Absoluletely not. I'm just saying that its all relative. Some people drive 55. Others drive 60. Are the people that drive 70 evil, while those driving 69 are stewards of the road? Would I say something or alert the police if I saw someone coming out of the water with a bunch of shorts? Yes. But its pretty crazy that so many people are dying to be hall monitors for such a minor infraction (e.g. taking a 'long to get a photo then returning it to the ocean).