Zept
Contributor
ReyeR asked...
BTW, can anyone technically explain what an orange (or any other colour) filter does?
From my understanding of filters it absorbs the other colours of the spectrum in varying degrees so strictly speaking it's not 'adding' on top of the available light but 'taking away'.
That's how I understand it. The red filter takes out some of the blue light so you end up with a more balanced spectrum. The downside is that less light reaches the lens so your shutter speed has to be slower.
The effect of the filter varies with depth (b/c the available spectrum changes). In the shallows I find it overkill. The Sony version can be removed underwater, so it's easier to take a shot with and a shot without and choose between them later.
A strobe gives much better results, no argument about that, but... right now, with only 130 dives under my cummerband, I am more interested in looking at things than in taking photographs. I like the fact that my camera is compact and can be clipped off to the hem of my BC when I am not using it. A strobe would make it a lot more cumbersome. The filtered photos are a million miles from perfect, but I find them easier to work with in Photoshop than the unfiltered ones. It's a compromise, but one I am happy with .
But my real purpose in posting the with and without pix was to show the difference, not to make an argument for or against the filter.
Zept