broncobowsher
Contributor
Along these same lines, what percentage of 300' dives are on OC compared to CC these days? Add in some filters for training dives and remove the commercial/military.The thing is, there is of course a higher incident rate with CCR than with OC, that's pretty easy math to do. What is hard to do is to say for any GIVEN dive if the risk is higher with CCR than with OC.
The reason why that's hard is that it's not clear how you would compare cohorts of OC and CCR dives, and see if the injury or fatality rate is higher with CCR for a cohort that is matched for profile. Since the average CCR diver is doing bigger dives than the average OC diver, you can't just compare the raw numbers.
Going forward, it's gong to be harder and harder to do that analysis, since fewer and fewer people doing VERY big dives are doing them on OC at all. So if you tell me that there was an accident on a 300 FSW dive in 2019, I'm also going to assume that it's a rebreather, but mainly because so many more people doing those dives are doing them on CCR. At some point, the amount of gas you need to carry with you becomes prohibitive.
I do agree with you about the need for surface support for "recreational" dives of this magnitude.
I recently scrubbed a 200' dive due to lack of surface support.