Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
That’s the problem though, it’s not like there’s a cycle of “bad batch timelines” that you can get on. The whole idea of a bad batch is that it’s random and unpredictable. We’re they more common in the past? I’m not sure that’s the case. Is QC better now? Maybe. But people still get E. Coli.
Tom brings up another good point re:cell age and failure. It’s certainly another consideration.
My instructor told me that the stock JJ Vandegraph were more reliable than the AI sensors. I guess I forgot his advice the first time I changed the sensors and bought AI. Can't remember the exact issues, but I remember them being much less stable and slower to react than the Vandegraphs. Bought Vandegraphs again, all went back to normal.
Just one anecdote, take it for whatever it's worth.
Does anyone have any experience with german nrc-international cells?
Their cell for JJ-CCR can be had with 69€.
Replace one cell every 6 months, this what I do in my rEvo which has 5 cells.
I think the point is that there's a lot of stories that people "heard from a friend or instructor" but when you start looking into it, bad batches just aren't a reality. It's more of an "urban legend" for lack of better words. I'm a very new rb diver, so I don't know the answer. I do know that I've asked people that no one can actually give me a true first hand account of bad batches. Obviously single bad cells are a thing, but whole runs or batches I don't know. My instrcuto's group of friends who have much more experience than me tend to think it's not a reality.
I was told that the vandegraph are better but that in the grand scheme of things AI are good enough. Y unit uses the same as a jj
So you have cells in your unit that are 2 years old?