El Buzo Loco once bubbled...
Repetitive dives...not enough surface interval time...pushing the tables beyond the limits.
Well that's presumptuous. How long of an SI did this diver have? What depths was he diving at? Did he exceed his computer's limits?
Were you there? No. I was.
My posting was to provide some information on
this particular incident so hopefully people will
learn something from it. Personally, I found the thumb and first 2 digits info quite interesting and thought others might too. I didn't post it to encourage people to make irrational statements based on conjecture. If you have questions, I'll be happy to try to answer them (without, of course, the benefit of having his computer in front of me, nor mine for that matter!) the best that I can.
Two dives on Saturday, two on Sunday.
Minumum 2 hr SI (both days but we'll just talk about Sunday). Actually longer. He was in the buddy team that went in (and out) right before me on the first dive on Sunday but then went in
after me but surfaced
before me for the second dive. I had more than a two hour SI so he would have had even longer. (I did not exceed my computer's limits.)
Diver was using a computer. He did not exceed "computer's" limits. First dive was on the Munson - max depth approx. 110ft. Second dive was on the Marsh - max depth approx. 80ft.
A quick glance at dive tables: it would appear that if he maxed his bottom time at 110ft with a 2hr SI, he would be a B diver for dive 2. That would give him approximately 20min at 80ft which sounds about right if I recall correctly what the first buddy team had reported. Now he had more than a 2hr SI so he might actually have been an A diver going in. (please correct me if I have erred)
We were wreck exploring so he wouldn't have gone deeper than me (by much anyway) without digging a hole in the bottom of the lake!
This diver is mid-to-late 40s, fit, non-smoker.
Diverlady