Humuhumunukunukuapua'a
Contributor
I agree that the lack of cummerbunds and padding is a big advantage of a BP/W (or apparently some vest BCs).
As far as a BP/W being suitable for tech divers only, I disagree. I am a Recreational diver with no plans ever to get into tech diving. But after using a number of traditional and back-inflate BCDs, I realized I didn't want a lot of padding and bulk, and I didn't need it. Alos, the weight integration systems aren't really meant to accomodate lots of weight for cold water diving. A backplate puts more of the weight where I want it (as do the DSS weight plates).
I really like what the BP/W has done for my diving...swimming in a trim position is easier, more weight is incorporated into the plate, it packs smaller for travel and it is far more durable. I really can't think of any disadvantages. It even feels fine wearing it above water.
Cheers
As far as a BP/W being suitable for tech divers only, I disagree. I am a Recreational diver with no plans ever to get into tech diving. But after using a number of traditional and back-inflate BCDs, I realized I didn't want a lot of padding and bulk, and I didn't need it. Alos, the weight integration systems aren't really meant to accomodate lots of weight for cold water diving. A backplate puts more of the weight where I want it (as do the DSS weight plates).
I really like what the BP/W has done for my diving...swimming in a trim position is easier, more weight is incorporated into the plate, it packs smaller for travel and it is far more durable. I really can't think of any disadvantages. It even feels fine wearing it above water.
Cheers