non-digital flash works with A80

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

ChrisA

Contributor
Messages
1,301
Reaction score
2
Location
Redondo Beach, California
# of dives
200 - 499
I have a Canon A80 and decided to try and use it with a plain old non-digital slave strobe. Success. It turns out in "M" mode the camera does NOT pre-flalsh. It works fine with a "workhorse" Vivitar 285 stobe with a Wein peanut hotshoe slave sensor attached and it seems to work with a 1000 watt second Norman studio powerpack system.

This means it should work with the lowest priced UW srtobe in "M" mode.

I may even put the Vivitar and Wein sensor inside a glass jar and try it under water. Used manual flashed are dirt cheap and the Wein sesor is waterproof so the most I'd loose is a cheap flash
 
"the most I'd loose is a cheap flash" or a couple fingers from shorting the capacitors... :-)

You should also be able to turn off the pre-flash by turning off red-eye reduction (found under the "Menu" button while in record mode.

Cheers,
 
I thought so too. But no. The camera will preflash even with red eye off. It uses the preflash as a kind of light meter I think. You can't see it preflash like you can with a red eye reduction preflash but it's there an triggers a slave such that it fire to soon, efore the shuitter opens.

KrisB:
You should also be able to turn off the pre-flash by turning off red-eye reduction (found under the "Menu" button while in record mode.

Cheers,
 
Huh. All I had noticed was a red light coming from an LED in a different part of the camera. Would this be causing the slave to fire? I really don't know how the slaves work -- I would have thought it was restricted to bright white light, but maybe any momentary light source cause the flash.

I know the red light is used in low-light situations to help the focus (if the camera can't see what you're trying to focus on, it can't autofocus).
 
You can't see the non-redeye preflash. It happens to close to the main flash. There is
maybe a one thousandth of a second space between the two flashes.

The slave I have is made by "Wein" and has been made and in common use by
(mostly) profesional photographers for many years. It is about a 1 inch rounded cube of plexiglas with a hot shoe on top. You can see the electronics inside the solid clear block of plastic as if it were frozen inside an ice cube. It needs a pretty bright light to flash. The A80's flash at low poer will trigger it if there is a clear light of sight but not if the flash is bounced off a wall 20 feet away.

No, I don't really intend to make a UW flash. But now I know a cheap used sea and sea film camera slave flash will work. And also now on land I can take pictures of a large group.

maybe ther whole discussion is moot. I just checked the web and found they
make a line of "digital slaves"
http://www.omegasatter.com/v2/products/displaycategory.cfm?CatID=495



KrisB:
Huh. All I had noticed was a red light coming from an LED in a different part of the camera. Would this be causing the slave to fire? I really don't know how the slaves work -- I would have thought it was restricted to bright white light, but maybe any momentary light source cause the flash.

I know the red light is used in low-light situations to help the focus (if the camera can't see what you're trying to focus on, it can't autofocus).
 

Back
Top Bottom