- Messages
- 98,137
- Reaction score
- 99,751
- Location
- On the Fun Side of Trump's Wall
- # of dives
- 2500 - 4999
It was to get some understanding of why solo diving is not recommended in an overhead environment.
As a matter of interest, how many of you solo dive in an overhead environment.
It's a false assumption that solo diving is not recommended in an overhead environment. In some circumstances, solo is the safest way to do the dive. The people doing it, however, are highly skilled, highly trained, and have SIGNIFICANTLY less attitude than I read in most of your posts. They've been tested under fire, and know exactly where their limits lie. They wouldn't ever consider some of the risks you claim to be taking ... despite being significantly more experienced and skilled than you are. And, for the most part, these people would view your position to be risky and stupid.
If your profile is accurate, I've got more solo dives than you have dives ... even if you're at the high end of the indicated range. And although I've solo dived in an overhead environment, I've done so only after getting the training, knowledge and experience to prepare for the risks. I also know enough to recognize a building situation that would exceed my limits and turn the dive before it happened. In many ways, I'm far more conservative on those "big" solo dives than I am when I'm diving a simple recreational dive with a trusted dive buddy.
Based on your posts I think you're either a troll or somebody who's on a path to a very bad situation. Either way, good luck ... I don't think I'd ever want to dive with you, as I view people with your attitude way more dangerous than either sharks or overhead environments ...
... Bob (Grateful Diver)