A series of posts in another thread (Devil's Throat question) caused me to wonder - for diving within recreational (NDL) limits, how often do people actually use any kind of 'best mix'? The question is difficult to articulate, so here is the background.
1. In teaching nitrox, I go through a number of calculations with students, to determine what the maximum percentage O2 would be for a given depth and MOD. I generally use a MOD of 1.4 for these exercises, and point out that problems with oxygen toxicity are quite unlikely to present if you stay at or below a PO2 of 1.4 - not impossible, just very improbable. I go on to say that, while you can use any mix that you determine to be best, you will seldom have a problem with the common banked mixes (32% probably being the most common, with 30% also available in our area) in recreational diving. If the depth you want to reach doesn't work with the banked mix available, either stay shallower or go to air. (Or, ask the fill operation if they can give you a more precise, depth-adjusted mix).
2. Personally, I can think of only one time in the past 10 years when I intentionally blended a mix other than a banked nitrox mix for recreational diving. I was going on a wreck at 136 feet, and diluted some 30% to get a slightly lighter mix. (This may contradict my emphasis on 'recreational' diving, but that is not the point.) And, I have used lighter mixes resulting from topping off partially used nitrox bottles with air. But, that was also a matter of convenience. While I have 'clean for oxygen service' bottles available, and the ability to partial pressure blend whatever I want, I also don't blend richer mixes for shallower depths for recreational dives. The other divers I am usually in the water with do the same.
My question: how frequently do experienced divers tweak their mixes, beyond banked mixes, for recreational diving? And, where you do 'tweak' the oxygen concentration - between 21 and 40% - why? Or, perhaps, the better question is, on what quantitative basis do you do so?
I don't intend the question as a criticism of 'best mix' approaches. (And, I am really not interested in resurrecting another recreational trimix discussion, although that may happen.) Rather, I am now intrigued by what the usual and customary practice is outside of my own little world. Maybe, I just opt for convenience (or am lazy, or cheap), and 30%, 32%, or 21% seem to work for what I want to do.
1. In teaching nitrox, I go through a number of calculations with students, to determine what the maximum percentage O2 would be for a given depth and MOD. I generally use a MOD of 1.4 for these exercises, and point out that problems with oxygen toxicity are quite unlikely to present if you stay at or below a PO2 of 1.4 - not impossible, just very improbable. I go on to say that, while you can use any mix that you determine to be best, you will seldom have a problem with the common banked mixes (32% probably being the most common, with 30% also available in our area) in recreational diving. If the depth you want to reach doesn't work with the banked mix available, either stay shallower or go to air. (Or, ask the fill operation if they can give you a more precise, depth-adjusted mix).
2. Personally, I can think of only one time in the past 10 years when I intentionally blended a mix other than a banked nitrox mix for recreational diving. I was going on a wreck at 136 feet, and diluted some 30% to get a slightly lighter mix. (This may contradict my emphasis on 'recreational' diving, but that is not the point.) And, I have used lighter mixes resulting from topping off partially used nitrox bottles with air. But, that was also a matter of convenience. While I have 'clean for oxygen service' bottles available, and the ability to partial pressure blend whatever I want, I also don't blend richer mixes for shallower depths for recreational dives. The other divers I am usually in the water with do the same.
My question: how frequently do experienced divers tweak their mixes, beyond banked mixes, for recreational diving? And, where you do 'tweak' the oxygen concentration - between 21 and 40% - why? Or, perhaps, the better question is, on what quantitative basis do you do so?
I don't intend the question as a criticism of 'best mix' approaches. (And, I am really not interested in resurrecting another recreational trimix discussion, although that may happen.) Rather, I am now intrigued by what the usual and customary practice is outside of my own little world. Maybe, I just opt for convenience (or am lazy, or cheap), and 30%, 32%, or 21% seem to work for what I want to do.
Last edited: