JahJahwarrior:
Most software designers seem to serve Microsoft, and many programs aren't made for Macs.
Blame mac's asinine (former) licensing policy. They did it to themselves - hardly anyone could afford the rates they charged. And who's going to pay licensing fees for software developed in-house, for in-house use? There is a reason why mac went from the largest OS company to 3% of the market, and they only have themselves to blame.
JahJahwarrior:
But, you can easily run XP on a mac. Yes, you have to purchase XP, but it can be done and most people who need to use a PC-only program do this, rather than face the horror of PC.
And what horror is that? The insides of a mac vs pc are identical, although macs have less variety. The only real difference is the OS. The very fact that many mac owners are now running xp speaks volumes...
JahJahwarrior:
As for iLife being superflous, I remind you that PC comes with a video software as well, just it's freaking useless.
But it is removable. Ilife is not, and is "integrated" to the point where removing it would make the computer unusable.
JahJahwarrior:
iLife actually works. Being able to make slideshows is very nice and useful, especially for a businessman.
Really? All of the businessmen/women I know use powerpoint or some other form of presentation software. As do I.
And, if you want to get picky, PC's also have a slideshow feature - simply open a folder of pictures, hit "show slide show", vola - slideshow...
JahJahwarrior:
You have to be able to speak well and with visual aids, and when it comes to visual aids, Mac does just as well, if not better than, PC's.
Every scientific presentation I have ever seen - and I've seen thousands (and given dozens myself) used powerpoint. Even those given on macs. There is a reason for that - powerpoint works and is easy to use. It one of the few microsoft products I don't mind spending money on, and is far superior to any other presentation software I've tried.
That said, I do have a lot of hope for open office...
JahJahwarrior:
Especially for grpahics and video, it seems to me that most people seem to use Final Cut Pro HD, or Avid. (Avid is PC, I think.....I use FCP
)
This was true in the past, but no longer. Most major editing suits are now made cross-platform (FCP is the only exception), as are all image editors of significance. Video editing is a hobby of mine, I own several editing packages, and all are PC based. I migrated away form FCP years ago (at the same time as I moved away from macs), and have never looked back.
Now if only they'd make a decent linux editing package.
JahJahwarrior:
Indeed, straight off the bat, without paying a few hundred for any other software, Mac is set up and ready to make you a video or manage your photos.
But at an added cost that exceeds the cost of buying equivalent software...
JahJahwarrior:
And one of the reasons I have decided to never give Mr. Gates any money again is, well, my computer blew up. When I got it running again, they pretty much refused to let me reinstall XP with the old numbers, I spent hours and hours with tech support but basically I had to go and buy the software again.
You're very unique in this. Installing XP, even on upgraded systems, is easy. I do it all the time, and have never had the problems you describe.
And, with a PC, you at least have the option of upgrading. Mac's are very limited in this - when the allow it at all.
JahJahwarrior:
Upon loading this software, I discovered that I couldn't even watch a dvd! I was expected to pay another $15 for codecs to watch a dvd!
That was foolish. There are a ton of free codecs, and players, for DVD on PCs. Likewise, the new media player will play dvd's, and is free, through windows update.
Bryan