Ok.. everybody take a deep breath here. I’m am sure my opinions here are probably not going to be popular, but I would suggest some of you to calm down and think critically a little bit about stories like this.
I worked (formerly) in the beverage industry, and have a fair amount if inside knowledge of the industry. (Not Nestle BTW).
Their existing facility IS currently operating under a 20yr permit for the water. They pay for the permit, but not the actual water. This is no different than many other industries who source water from either ground water or municipal water systems. It is not at all unusual for there to be no charge for the actual water other than for municipal infrastructure at many plants. Many beverage plants actually pay for discharge which is rated based on BODs and what needs to be treated from the waste. (Off topic),
What I find interesting is the lack of information about water studies and actual impact to the watershed, one article talks about impact to White Spring, which I find ridiculous, White spring stopped flowing years ago and long before any of the water plants were built in the area.
I am all for being very careful with our resources and making sure we don’t do damage to our ecosystem. I just find many people can’t resist resorting to misinformation and lazy arguments, to support a enviro-political agenda.
My parting thought on this topic: Brewing of beer is probably the most environmentally harmful beverage option. Not even considering the agricultural impact of the hops, the brewing process wastes 5:1 water for the end product. I have yet to see any environmentalist waging war on the beer producers.