I think the type of diver Dan is talking about would be doing a proper pre-dive check, would be able to turn their own gas on while swimming, and would both be aware of their buddies and able to assist with problems. In other words, I don't think he is talking about AOW divers with 30 dives.
As has been pointed out, bad stuff happens. Even in this case, the woman jumped in with a properly turned on tank. But she still sank. If her BCD was partly inflated, she should have floated...simplifying the rescue.
If it was a dive with dan, no one would know until towards the end of the dive; and the
body would probably never be found. But if you listen to him, an entry that may have saved her is "defective".
If you were new to diving, then gear might come off on an entry off the platform....What I see off of many thousands of dives on charterboats in S fl, is that the people that dive alot, will have gear attached snugly, it will be streamlined, and it will not come off when they jump in.....
Riiiggghhttt....Because gear never breaks at the worst time.
In any event, I will re-stress, that it is the "Captain" and their skill in deciding where to drop my buddies and I into the water that allows us to hit the wreck or reef with precision each time.
Oh, I get it. If you get lucky and hit the wreck, It's because you did it. If you miss, it's obviously the Captain's fault.
Nice way to dodge the blame for your errors.
So I am very picky about what dive boats I use in South florida. On the other hand, I have done some captaining of private boats myself, and I can do a 'fair" job of dropping, so I can estimate where I want to be dropped, and then get a captain without drop experience, to get us to a wreck---but this is not diving skill--this is captaining skill.
Just tell us who you use; so I can avoid patronizing them...or running into you on a boat. I like how you say that you can make this estimate...It really isn't about the Captain;
it's about you bragging.
Back to the original point....this was in a discussion where a diver accident occurred, and the comment one poster made was that the diver should not have done a free descent, that they should have used a line to go down--that this was a safer and better method. I took issue with this, as a procedure. This is how this thread began, not by my just "out of the blue", deciding to trash use of lines for descent and ascent.
Yeah, it really was about you. You started off by saying your technique, which works were you are, is the best and only way to dive- all other methods are "defective" according to you. The truth is, you are wrong. Using a line is demonstratably safer and better. Your method is filled with risk.
The current was very slight that day, and another boat dropped on this wreck with us, and they tied off a line...Sandra likes the ease of the line for ascent, so she took the opportunity to use it and relax all the way up....this was an easy day for up or down on a line
So, why don't you come out and declare your wife 'defective' in the same shrill voice you decried lines earlier???
i dont wanna be a party pooper but i'm not sure how you did 25 mins at 240ish with two 80s to get you all the way to 20 feet even getting super creative with the minimum gas calculations...
I say it's called lying. He's all about big talk...but that's about it. REad PFCAj's posts and his destruction of dan's lies.
Does anyone else here know dan and his diving?
And dan, while you're here, would you care to tell us about Gladius or Maximus investments?