Scubatooth once bubbled...
i dont know but to me the rodales article stinks of rotten fish. of course there going to spin the article in there favor since its on there site.
... i find the info on a good review in places other then rodales
Anyway, the problem is that RSD caters very much to those large scuba manufactures, and agencies, to their end of the industrie. And they like the writing as it is, as they like their customer as they are (un- or misinformed).
Problem is, it's hard to find a better option. DIVER from the UK is a very good magazine, they test equipment (and you'd be suprised how good FF did in their tests). It's available on news stand every once in a while, but pretty expensive. The Germans have two very good diving mags that test (again, FF did well repeatedly over the years), but obviously in German and by subscription only in the US. By the way, my fave UW mag is Advanced Diver Magazine, but they don't do comparison tests.
I wonder if Bob Evans has a point asking for millions. Look at the splits, how the came crashing into the market. I wonder how many people bought a pair, or at least tried them, because of Rodale's glowing reviews ... . After all, they were close to $200 bucks, pretty expensive for a goofy looking fin that nobody knew. These days, half the people on the boat have them. So if FF would have gotten the rave reviews, I'm afraid the company would have done much better. Afraid, because it's a scary thought that that rag is that powerfull. :upset: