cool_hardware52
Contributor
Stephen Ash:Tobin, I have no intention of going tit for tat with you over everything you say but this is simply hyperbole.
It is not hyperbole, if I wasn't late for morning dive I take minute and find a few recent examples.
Stephen Ash:I find your rig, assembled without an STA, to be less than ideal... FOR ME. IMHO, a STA improves the stability.
Fine, by all means use one. Posting staged photos to support your "preference" does nothing but damage your creditbility.
Stephen Ash:I'm sorry that I can't say that without offending you but that's my opinion. I've tried to compliment the things that I like about your rig but somehow you take that as a "smear" and accuse me of an "agenda".
All I'm asking you to do is back up your claim. Dogma is pretty useless, repetition of a claim does not prove it, but it does indicate an agenda.
I'm not offended by your claim. I have repeatedly asked you to be specific about how and when this "improved stability" is benefical during actual scuba use. All you do is repeat your claim that it's more stable.
The DSS users that have reported in this thread and others say they can detect no tank movement How exactly then is the "added stability" of a STA a benefit to the diver? Please be specific.
Stephen Ash:Believe it or not, Tobin, you have not perfected the backplate and wing... nobody has.
I've never claimed perfection, ever. Every design has compromises. I do know what the strenghts of my design are however, and I will defend them when intentional misinformation is presented.
Stephen Ash:Tobin, I applaud your contibutions to the board. There are many times where you field questions that have nothing to do with your product at all. But what would really be neat would be to have a manufacturer that would come to the board with a mature, open mind willing to exchange ideas and thoughts.
When I failed to do exactly that? There are many competing solutions to most problems, each with their pros and cons. My objection is to intentional misinformation.
Stephen Ash:Just because we might have some dislikes or preferences or whatever doesn't mean we're part of some conspiracy.
When you posted staged false photos to create the impression of problem it sure smells like one, and apparently not just to me.
I've never ever challenged anybody on their personal preferences, or specifically their use of a STA. I've been very consistent on this matter. It's pretty black and white.
Pros: STA's can be a means of adding weight, and they do permit quickly changing from single tanks to doubles.
Cons: STA's add cost, parts, move the tank away from the diver, and add to the assembly and dissasembly time and effort.
I've never said STA's were evil, just unnecessary most of the time. My wings will accomodate most STA's why would I do that if I was anti STA?
Stephen Ash:I will try this setup without the wedge blocks.
Again, I'd recommend retaining the wedge blocks. Almost all our users find them useful. They serve several purposes inluding reducing the max load on the cambuckle. This both reduces the required closing force, and protects the buckle from breakage. The only buckle we've ever had returned was from somebody who was not using the wedge blocks.
Stephen Ash:This is simply my personal feeling on the matter. It is not meant as an attack on you or your gear.
The staged photos and your plaintive pleas for help were just honest mistakes.......
Tobin