victorzamora
Contributor
Do instructors really have that much freedom to vary from the cert agency requirements?
..If that's a common practice, that tends to reinforce some of by skepticism on the trend towards 'official' certification required for darn near everything. I certainly yield to greater base of knowledge.. But darn! If an agency can't maintain some form of consistency, than how am I that much better off vs having a trusted buddy/mentor show me the ropes?
There are plenty of people better suited to answer this question than myself, but I'll tell you that there's plenty of reason to get the "official" cert, but many of the "specialties" could be served just as well through proper mentorship. The "official" certs do have standards that the instructors have to follow. One thing TDI does that I truly appreciate is publishing their standards....so check them out for a Tech course you're familiar with and one you want to take or haven't taken. They certainly spell out minimums, skills&drills to be covered, things to be discussed, etc. Some instructors well exceed the minimums and others vaguely get in the general area of the minimums and call it good enough.....like taking your AOW class to 61ft, even though the entire group had to stay at 59ft they got to see the instructor's computer read out >60ft so that's their "deep dive."
My point was simply that the agencies require drills but don't specify the details. For example, they'll require "lights out drills" but don't specify what kind of exit to teach. Some instructors teach in-line (one diver immediately behind the other, constant contact) while others teach "bump-and-go" and others teach this stacked/nested on-the-elbow type swim-out. I haven't yet come across an agency that specified which type of lights-out exit to use. I haven't come across an agency that officially recommends one lost-line drill over the rest....but they all require it (as far as I'm aware).