justinthedeeps
Contributor
I guess this and other recent incidents expose a seldom-admitted weakness of passive flow systems.
One one hand, it is celebrated as 'simpler and less prone to failure'
On the other hand, it can not correct a rapid significant drop in ppO2 (e.g. on ascent), whereas a solenoid aka auto-MAV can. And subtle flow issues can go unnoticed.
The passive flow is supposed to keep the diver alive (otherwise why even have an orifice at all?) But a reliance on this assumption sounds dangerous.
So it sounds pretty similar to a solenoid stuck closed. We should probably all assume that our orifices or solenoids are going to block at some point. We just don't know when. [Begin drill...]
One one hand, it is celebrated as 'simpler and less prone to failure'
On the other hand, it can not correct a rapid significant drop in ppO2 (e.g. on ascent), whereas a solenoid aka auto-MAV can. And subtle flow issues can go unnoticed.
The passive flow is supposed to keep the diver alive (otherwise why even have an orifice at all?) But a reliance on this assumption sounds dangerous.
So it sounds pretty similar to a solenoid stuck closed. We should probably all assume that our orifices or solenoids are going to block at some point. We just don't know when. [Begin drill...]