Lobzilla
Contributor
Thanks Kingpatzer for the honest account.
Aside from the physiological killers like hypercapnia, hypoxyia, narcosis, etc. the worst enemy for a diver is his/her own brain. Our instinctive response to the (perceived) threat of running out of air is to ascent rapidly. Bad move after a certain depth and/or duration. And even worse move with breath holding.
During OW training we get told what to do and what not but nowhere in the training curriculum is the need to rewire our brain addressed. Even GUE does not allow (anymore?) that an instructor removes a student's mask or closes one of his redundant air supplies (unless an emergency requires closing/isolation).
It is assumed that as we build experience in, mostly eventless, dives we will automatically mature from instinctive to rational responses.
I think this is a dangerous fallacy especially if it coupled with the assumption that our buddy is going to save the day when (not if) we act stupid.
I have spend the last 20 years in the skies and can assure you that aviation training is much more suitable to prevent instinctive aggravation of events. Not perfect, as we still have the occasional smoking hole in the ground, but better.
A 'must have' attitude regarding checklists and solid contingency plans are part of the equation. The more valuable part is that in primary flight training and later in the simulator the student's response under stress will determine his/her progress, rank, and paygrade. Again, this is not a perfect selection system but better than dive training. When was the las time you got actually failed in a class? Never, because we are all perfect, right.
When the news about Capt. Sullenberger's successful emergency landing in the Hudson river broke I wagered a bet with a friend that this 'guy' either had serious combat experience or must have flown gliders. I was correct on the second count. There is no substitute for training in 'one shot and one shot only' scenarios. The potential of flunking out of your life/health right in your face is even more instructive than the potential of flunking a class.
Pilots also learn early on to fly solo and have the opportunity to deal with the angst of having ultimate authority but also ultimate responsibility.
The experience requirements for solo dives delay the development of responsible self-control in my opinion. There was a thread a while ago that a DM candidate bolted after getting 'lost' in open water with plenty of air and no technical malfunction. He was lucky to surface in front of a rescue class and close to a chamber.
In contrast, a student(!) pilot must conduct a set of solo cross-country flights to learn that competent pilots do not get lost - just temporarily disoriented .
How can we achieve this realistic training in diving without creating a temporary spike in the accident statistics and getting someone's shorts twisted over violating the 'must have buddy/nanny' mantra?
Kingpanzer, you taught you brain a very important lesson by 'punishing' yourself for a stupid move. If our instructors or buddies are not yelling at us we have to yell at ourselves for even the slightest goof. Once our brain fears the pain of (self)humiliation more than temporary choking we will not bolt anymore.
In my case, a simple whack over the head with a chart from my instructor tought my brain once and for all that the instinctive response of slowing down an airplane is a really bad idea when things are getting out of control.
I would like to have similar wake-up calls as a novice diver. Maybe an 'invisible fence' collar monitoring the ascent rate should become a PADI training aid
Anyone having better ideas? I honstly cannot see myself continue to dive with this "just keep logging dives and dive with a buddy and everything will be fine" attitude.
As Kingpanzer proved, Mr. Murphy may (and will) throw us a curve ball at any point in our tenure and it is our rational assessment and appropriate response that has the power to save the day and nothing else.
So how do we train this 'rational assessment and appropriate response' early on?
Aside from the physiological killers like hypercapnia, hypoxyia, narcosis, etc. the worst enemy for a diver is his/her own brain. Our instinctive response to the (perceived) threat of running out of air is to ascent rapidly. Bad move after a certain depth and/or duration. And even worse move with breath holding.
During OW training we get told what to do and what not but nowhere in the training curriculum is the need to rewire our brain addressed. Even GUE does not allow (anymore?) that an instructor removes a student's mask or closes one of his redundant air supplies (unless an emergency requires closing/isolation).
It is assumed that as we build experience in, mostly eventless, dives we will automatically mature from instinctive to rational responses.
I think this is a dangerous fallacy especially if it coupled with the assumption that our buddy is going to save the day when (not if) we act stupid.
I have spend the last 20 years in the skies and can assure you that aviation training is much more suitable to prevent instinctive aggravation of events. Not perfect, as we still have the occasional smoking hole in the ground, but better.
A 'must have' attitude regarding checklists and solid contingency plans are part of the equation. The more valuable part is that in primary flight training and later in the simulator the student's response under stress will determine his/her progress, rank, and paygrade. Again, this is not a perfect selection system but better than dive training. When was the las time you got actually failed in a class? Never, because we are all perfect, right.
When the news about Capt. Sullenberger's successful emergency landing in the Hudson river broke I wagered a bet with a friend that this 'guy' either had serious combat experience or must have flown gliders. I was correct on the second count. There is no substitute for training in 'one shot and one shot only' scenarios. The potential of flunking out of your life/health right in your face is even more instructive than the potential of flunking a class.
Pilots also learn early on to fly solo and have the opportunity to deal with the angst of having ultimate authority but also ultimate responsibility.
The experience requirements for solo dives delay the development of responsible self-control in my opinion. There was a thread a while ago that a DM candidate bolted after getting 'lost' in open water with plenty of air and no technical malfunction. He was lucky to surface in front of a rescue class and close to a chamber.
In contrast, a student(!) pilot must conduct a set of solo cross-country flights to learn that competent pilots do not get lost - just temporarily disoriented .
How can we achieve this realistic training in diving without creating a temporary spike in the accident statistics and getting someone's shorts twisted over violating the 'must have buddy/nanny' mantra?
Kingpanzer, you taught you brain a very important lesson by 'punishing' yourself for a stupid move. If our instructors or buddies are not yelling at us we have to yell at ourselves for even the slightest goof. Once our brain fears the pain of (self)humiliation more than temporary choking we will not bolt anymore.
In my case, a simple whack over the head with a chart from my instructor tought my brain once and for all that the instinctive response of slowing down an airplane is a really bad idea when things are getting out of control.
I would like to have similar wake-up calls as a novice diver. Maybe an 'invisible fence' collar monitoring the ascent rate should become a PADI training aid
Anyone having better ideas? I honstly cannot see myself continue to dive with this "just keep logging dives and dive with a buddy and everything will be fine" attitude.
As Kingpanzer proved, Mr. Murphy may (and will) throw us a curve ball at any point in our tenure and it is our rational assessment and appropriate response that has the power to save the day and nothing else.
So how do we train this 'rational assessment and appropriate response' early on?
Last edited: