This is just lazy BS.
Carrying all the gas you need for a 420ft dive does make you look like a Christmas tree but its totally do able. Also bringing safety divers so you are not tethered to the mooring is also do-able. Relying on team BO went the way of the dodo years ago because it does not work (reliably).
There are units which are more and less sensitive to flooding, loop humidity, basically water in one form or another inside. Bringing 5 sensors so you can afford to lose some and dive with a broken unit is balony. This issue is solved by buying a unit which is easier to field repair or better yet designed so you don't have internal corrosion in the first place. Alternatively, in a pinch, get it inspected and serviced before a trip of a lifetime half a world away.
You were correct. They could NOT fix his effed connector.
My point was not really meant to say 5 sensors is better because then you can dive with a broken unit and still have 3. My anecdote may not have been very well-chosen. My point there was that, if you don't want to use splitters, then a 3 sensor digital unit has a single point of failure in the O2 board. A 5 sensor unit with an analog monitor means that you can lose your digital O2 board and still finish your dive in CC mode, on the loop. The rest of that was just meant to present an example where it would really be preferable to stay on the loop versus going to BO. Moreso than a cave dive where you have staged PLENTY of BO gas along your exit.
Maybe carrying 5 x AL80s of BO is no big deal (though it sounds like a big deal, to me), and maybe that is plenty of gas to get out if you do bail at the furthest point of your really deep dive. But, for a dive like that, the idea that you could also have any single 1st stage blow out and lose one of your cylinders of BO gas would make me pretty nervous.
I realize that what I'm talking about now is losing your O2 board AND 1 first stage, and our mantra is "we only plan for 1 failure". That idea still seems like it would make me nervous, even if I were trained and qualified for a dive that deep. Technically, I am trained for an OC dive that deep (though I don't have the experience and workup dives to say I'm qualified for 420 feet). If I were planning that dive on OC, I would certainly be allowing for the possibility of losing a whole cylinder of gas. Not allowing for that when planning that kind of dive on CCR because "we only plan for 1 failure" just doesn't feel right to me.
But, if there is an alternative that makes it where I can stay on the loop, in CC mode, if I lose my O2 board, well, that seems like a pretty good idea.