Basking Ridge Diver
Contributor
Control doesnt have to indicate a nefarious purpose.
Ah - never mind I see you live in Chicago... ha ha ha...
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Control doesnt have to indicate a nefarious purpose.
..........................
Control doesnt have to indicate a nefarious purpose.
Not until there is a fee....then the reason is obvious, more tax money.
A permit system for a activity that is extremely low in that area indicates the government implementing fees in the future shows to me that its nothing more than a money maker. And yes I'm making that leap now before they start making it a fee.
Ah - never mind I see you live in Chicago... ha ha ha...
Whats your insinuation here just out of curiosity?
Folks...
Money collected goes for annual re and re of wreck shot lines...sales and marketing for the park...preservation maintenance of the wrecks...trash collection...to name but a few...
View attachment 515161
Not be a jerk Warren, but how does one pay to preserve and perform maintenance on a shipwreck?
The only cost I can somewhat agree with is putting mooring lines on them to dissuade grappling and a permanent anchor off the wreck. However in the long run it's an exercise in futility as they WILL fall apart.
My problem with these fees dealing with diving is usually the funds go to everything but the activity you pay for. All of us divers pay enough as it is in equipment, training, gases, charters, so why pay to dive a site? I'm glad that here in the US that crap has been shot down at least 6 times. Only the USS Monitor and the USS Arizona are the only shipwrecks that are restricted in American waters.
Registration to dive a shipwreck is also a slippery slope.