PJC
Registered
My girlfriend and I are planning a 2 week trip to the Philippines in mid to late May. We are flying into Cebu and are currently considering three alternative itineraries:
1. Malapascua (5 nights) -> Bohol (8 nights)
2. Malapascua (5 nights) -> Dumaguete (8 nights)
3. Bohol (6-7 nights) -> Dumaguete (6-7 nights)
Alternatively we might consider substituting Malapascua for Moalboal.
We're primarily looking for great diving (ideally a mix of big and small stuff), and would particularly like to see mandarin fish. However, we won't want to dive every day so are also looking for places with a variety of land-based attractions (particularly walking and wildlife, but we also appreciate good food and live music).
We're currently leaning towards one of the options including Bohol, mainly so we can visit the tarsiers, but would love some guidance on the relative merits of Bohol and Dumaguete for land-based activities. On Bohol, I've heard good things about both Panglao and Cabilao, so recommendations on that also appreciated.
Any thoughts?
Many thanks
PJ
1. Malapascua (5 nights) -> Bohol (8 nights)
2. Malapascua (5 nights) -> Dumaguete (8 nights)
3. Bohol (6-7 nights) -> Dumaguete (6-7 nights)
Alternatively we might consider substituting Malapascua for Moalboal.
We're primarily looking for great diving (ideally a mix of big and small stuff), and would particularly like to see mandarin fish. However, we won't want to dive every day so are also looking for places with a variety of land-based attractions (particularly walking and wildlife, but we also appreciate good food and live music).
We're currently leaning towards one of the options including Bohol, mainly so we can visit the tarsiers, but would love some guidance on the relative merits of Bohol and Dumaguete for land-based activities. On Bohol, I've heard good things about both Panglao and Cabilao, so recommendations on that also appreciated.
Any thoughts?
Many thanks
PJ