Making The Scuba Industry Better

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

I think I understand the OP's intent so I will answer. By shortening the checkouts to one day would that lure more people into the sport? Having people only burn one day would save on their time, money for food and lodging where ever they travel. Allow them more diving if the cert is just part of their vacation. If the spouse they travel with say you can have one day and the rest of the vacation is mine. Ect ect. I'm sure there are as many more reasons I can't think of.

The negatives have to do with stress loading on the students caused by a shorter SI between dives (not having overnight to think about it).

The one new diver I have brought this up to said she wished her OW was one day so that she could have gotten on to diving the rest of her vacation. She didn't think there would be any problem with having a shorter SI, hours instead of over night. FWIW.

Correct...

I would say that approximately 1 out of every 2 students I certify ask if they can complete everything in one day (when told they have to do it over two.)

I don't want to seem like I'm tooting my own horn, but I believe this is because they feel so good about their skill level after pool work that they don't understand the need to drag things out. I agree with them - assuming... and let me be very clear... that when I get them out for checkouts... dive one and two go off without a hitch... buoyancy is pinpoint - skills are as fluid as they were in the pool etc... and we move on to dive three with the same results... it makes absolutely no sense to have to come back another day for one more dive.

It is not unusual for this scenario to play out. We arrive at the local quarry at 8:30 and are in the water for the first dive by 9:15. We get out at 10:00 after a nice 45 minute dive. We do a 45 minute surface interval and are back in the water at 10:45. We complete a second dive of 45 minutes and are out of the water at 11:30... we take a one hour surface interval - lunch break and are back in the water at 12:30 for our third and now final dive of the day... we are done at 1:15 after another 45 minute dive.

Nothing is rushed and the dives are very thorough... I'm regularly asked why we can't do the final dive and be done. My students are ready. They feel ready and I know they're ready. I also know this is exactly what they'll do when they get to their vacation in Bonaire or on that live-aboard. If we took another one hour surface interval and got back in the water at 2:15... we'd be done our 4th and final dive at 3:00pm... finish up all the paperwork and be on our way home.

The arguments I've heard against this here are weak. We need to give the divers time to collect their thoughts and ask questions? Really? I think if divers have that many questions at checkouts, there is a good possibility their training course was lacking.

I am happy to answer questions before, during and after the process... but I've never in my 8+ years of teaching had a student come back and ask a question on the second day that they didn't ask on the first as the event causing the question occurred. The only question I get is "Why did we have to come back for a second day for this - we could have done this 4th dive yesterday."
 
If this is true, I'd have to guess you're among the top 1% of quality instructors. Cream of the crop....Congratulations! How do you see this working out for the bottom 90%? Personally, I see a bigger potential for shorting students.

Your 180 minutes of BT is hardly the norm nor would it be possible 8 months out of the year where I instruct. I wish it was.

More convenient, faster, more profitable.... Yes, I believe so. Better for the sport? Not likely, IMO.
Correct...

I would say that approximately 1 out of every 2 students I certify ask if they can complete everything in one day (when told they have to do it over two.)

I don't want to seem like I'm tooting my own horn, but I believe this is because they feel so good about their skill level after pool work that they don't understand the need to drag things out. I agree with them - assuming... and let me be very clear... that when I get them out for checkouts... dive one and two go off without a hitch... buoyancy is pinpoint - skills are as fluid as they were in the pool etc... and we move on to dive three with the same results... it makes absolutely no sense to have to come back another day for one more dive.

It is not unusual for this scenario to play out. We arrive at the local quarry at 8:30 and are in the water for the first dive by 9:15. We get out at 10:00 after a nice 45 minute dive. We do a 45 minute surface interval and are back in the water at 10:45. We complete a second dive of 45 minutes and are out of the water at 11:30... we take a one hour surface interval - lunch break and are back in the water at 12:30 for our third and now final dive of the day... we are done at 1:15 after another 45 minute dive.

Nothing is rushed and the dives are very thorough... I'm regularly asked why we can't do the final dive and be done. My students are ready. They feel ready and I know they're ready. I also know this is exactly what they'll do when they get to their vacation in Bonaire or on that live-aboard. If we took another one hour surface interval and got back in the water at 2:15... we'd be done our 4th and final dive at 3:00pm... finish up all the paperwork and be on our way home.

The arguments I've heard against this here are weak. We need to give the divers time to collect their thoughts and ask questions? Really? I think if divers have that many questions at checkouts, there is a good possibility their training course was lacking.

I am happy to answer questions before, during and after the process... but I've never in my 8+ years of teaching had a student come back and ask a question on the second day that they didn't ask on the first as the event causing the question occurred. The only question I get is "Why did we have to come back for a second day for this - we could have done this 4th dive yesterday."
 
Correct...

I would say that approximately 1 out of every 2 students I certify ask if they can complete everything in one day (when told they have to do it over two.)

I don't want to seem like I'm tooting my own horn, but I believe this is because they feel so good about their skill level after pool work that they don't understand the need to drag things out. I agree with them - assuming... and let me be very clear... that when I get them out for checkouts... dive one and two go off without a hitch... buoyancy is pinpoint - skills are as fluid as they were in the pool etc... and we move on to dive three with the same results... it makes absolutely no sense to have to come back another day for one more dive.

It is not unusual for this scenario to play out. We arrive at the local quarry at 8:30 and are in the water for the first dive by 9:15. We get out at 10:00 after a nice 45 minute dive. We do a 45 minute surface interval and are back in the water at 10:45. We complete a second dive of 45 minutes and are out of the water at 11:30... we take a one hour surface interval - lunch break and are back in the water at 12:30 for our third and now final dive of the day... we are done at 1:15 after another 45 minute dive.

Nothing is rushed and the dives are very thorough... I'm regularly asked why we can't do the final dive and be done. My students are ready. They feel ready and I know they're ready. I also know this is exactly what they'll do when they get to their vacation in Bonaire or on that live-aboard. If we took another one hour surface interval and got back in the water at 2:15... we'd be done our 4th and final dive at 3:00pm... finish up all the paperwork and be on our way home.

The arguments I've heard against this here are weak. We need to give the divers time to collect their thoughts and ask questions? Really? I think if divers have that many questions at checkouts, there is a good possibility their training course was lacking.

I am happy to answer questions before, during and after the process... but I've never in my 8+ years of teaching had a student come back and ask a question on the second day that they didn't ask on the first as the event causing the question occurred. The only question I get is "Why did we have to come back for a second day for this - we could have done this 4th dive yesterday."


... and what do you do when things don't go exactly according to plan ... say you have a diver who inhales a bit of water while attempting to manually inflate their BCD, or who gets a bit of a CO2 hit while performing a rescue tow? Do you let them sit out a dive and collect themselves, or just tell 'em to suck it up and keep going?

Perhaps you're a far better instructor than me, and train perfect students every time ... but in my world, students sometimes do things we don't count on ... and letting them think about it overnight helps turn that mistake into a learning experience, rather than something they're gonna be scared of doing again on the next dive.

I can understand that multiple days inconveniences people ... although I have much easier access to dive sites than you do, I still have to contend with students who have busy schedules ... but if a person can't commit to the already minimal time requirements of an OW class, then perhaps diving isn't something they should be doing in the first place.

Entry level training is more than just a set of skills you read off a checklist ... we're helping people adapt to an environment they were never designed for. There's a mental adjustment that takes place during the checkout dives, just as there is during the confined water portion of the class ... and I have a hard time believing that any instructor is perfect enough to predict exactly how every student is going to respond once you put them in a real-world environment.

I just don't see an upside to it for the majority of your students. Sure, you will attract a few more because you're making it more convenient. But the downside is the number who will drop out because they felt rushed and unprepared to dive once class is over.

Oh ... let me guess ... you'll be selling those folks an Advanced class, so they can get five more dives with an instructor ... yeah ... that's the ticket ...

... Bob (Grateful Diver)
 
... Oh ... let me guess ... you'll be selling those folks an Advanced class, so they can get five more dives with an instructor ... yeah ... that's the ticket ...

... Bob (Grateful Diver)

Actually Bob... if you ask any of my students what I say about "advanced" courses, they will all tell you I don't advocate them. What I believe is that newly certified OW students should just go diving. I advocate spending time with other divers who have significant experience. Better to learn from those who have been there and done that - and to do it at no additional cost.

I have said this before and gotten beaten up for it. 9 out of 10 advanced classes are fluff and not necessary. You should know how to do these things when you're done your open water class. What good is it to hand someone a certification card to go diving... and then - after the fact tell them they need a boat diving course or a shore diving course etc...? Where do we think they're going to dive from when they're done Open Water? They surely should know about shore and boat entries and and exits and navigating these scenarios... and they shouldn't have to pay more for that. I can go on and on eliminating frivolous lets take your money specialties.

Of course I'm sure we'll agree there are some that are valuable. Some so valuable in fact that other posters have mentioned they include those as well in Open Water. I think we can all agree the skills learned in a Stress and Rescue Class are valuable. We'd also agree that those wanting to dive Nitrox should probably take the course. If you want to Solo dive, this is another course I'd recommend. Aside from that - most recreational courses I think are questionable at best. Cases can be made for Wreck diving, Advanced Navigation and Deep... although Deep within recreational limits of 130 feet should be part of the OW course... and it is in mine. While I can only issue that initial 60 feet cert as part of the course... I teach my students everything they need to know to safely dive to 130 feet.

The problem has become litigation in the industry. We all know that many agencies used to train to 130 feet. Somewhere along the way it was decided to change this to 60 feet... for two reasons. 1. It made sense to a greedy industry to now be able to charge more money for a follow up class.. and 2. The agency lawyers pushed it becase stats showed a majority of diving accidents occurred - when at some point during the dive the diver exceeded 60 feet. While most accidents happen at or near the surface, the fact divers had eclipsed 60 feet on the dive - gave the agencies an out. In other words - if an OW diver exceeds 60 feet - the agency, Instructor and everyone involved has a legal out. Students are told - and sign off agreeing that they understnd they're only certified to 60 feet. Go to 61 and get injured or die... and sorry, you exceeded your training. Agencies and shops will accept the risk now for more money...the proverbial put another dollar in.

I have never stated that all of my divers are perfect. Nobody is perfect... but they are competent. I also encourage them and invite them to go diving with me locally and on my trips... and I am happy to help them along the way at no additional cost.

Learning to dive is many things... but becoming a diver is many more. It includes navigating the gear buying experience and finding the best places to go diving on their budget. It can be a rewarding experience for many... but I agree the dropout rate is astronomically high. There are many reasons for this. Poor training and unease due to it - is certainly one of them. Financial considerations are another. Many people all across our country and the world dream of becoming divers... and the initial cost of a training class is really a mere pittance. The real cost becomes the what after. For most, even the gear purchase is a pittance... so now they're certified and they have the gear. The bigger question is where do they go diving.

Not everyone will be a hardcore local diver. Even if they start locally, they usually quit after a while as repitition becomes boring. The travel is where the big expense is in this industry and travel has taken a big hit. People are either deciding not to travel right now - or they simply can't afford to travel. I think the primary reason people drop out of the sport is because they either become bored with local diving and/or they cant afford to travel to the exotic destinations of their dreams.

I hear this all the time. I invite people on trips... at incredible prices they can not get on their own... and the replies are "I really don't have the money right now" or "I can't take the time off." The second is another big problem in our society right now. To keep their jobs, people are putting vacations and fun on the back burner... afraid if they even ask for time off - they could jeopardize their job.

About three years ago, when the economy tanked - it became quite clear the industry would struggle... and it has. There are pockets around the country doing OK... but anyone in this industry that says things are great is FOS. My original post is a cost cutting, time saver, make it better and easier for people to get involved - without taking anything away from training standards... except the inconvenience of an uncessesary 2nd checkout day. I still say, it's not about the hours in the days... it about the hours and quality in the dives. Make it an option... and it won't hurt the industry... it will help grow the industry. Those who want and need the second day can have it... nobody wants to take it away... they want to make it optional and based on need... not just some arbitrary overnight mandate.
 
Ken, I agree with everything you just said ... except for the last three sentences in the final paragraph. Some instructors, and some students, and some environments could probably handle it just fine.

But what we've seen in the dive industry is that as soon as you make something quicker and cheaper it becomes the new baseline ... in other words, you might make it "optional", but the majority of dive ops and instructors would make it the standardized offering ... for purely economic reasons. And I think that would have a detrimental effect on learning and retention ... which would ultimately do more to harm the industry, long-term.

I'm sure there are students who could handle it ... I do not believe they represent the majority of OW students ... not even in a warm-water environment, and certainly not in a cold-water one.

But ... trying to look at this over the objections of my personal beliefs ... it might work if it were linked to a mandated increase in pool time, as well as an increase in overall instructor qualifications. Instructors who can manage their time effectively ... particularly during confined water sessions ... might be able to pull it off. But they'd still have to overcome the hurdles of an OW demographic that is increasingly older and decreasingly in physical shape to deal with that sort of a schedule.

... Bob (Grateful Diver)
 
I can see it now. The shop will advertise how they save you $$ by doing the OW dives in one day and don't even charge you any extra. But, if you need a 2nd day, there will have to be an extra charge. Tell me I'm wrong.
 
I am a little late in weighing in here, but once again I think Jim Laplenta is right. 2nd post in thread) Among the criteria for establishing the method, content and duration of a scuba course, convenience and brevity do not make my list at all. If anything, thoroughness and remediation are at the top. A two day open water regimen allows for remediation of divers who have specific problems. It allows for longer dives- and like Jim said, there is a big difference between a three to four hour underwater training weekend and an hour to hour and a half from 4 quick dips to demonstrate skills. This later routine is only marginally different that the pool classes. I think the OP really misses it here. I like diving with competent divers, whether I am leading them on a dive, or just in the vicinity as another recreational diver. We train divers here in a cold fresh water environment in which visibility ranges from 5 feet to 15 feet. We train at a platform at 20 feet, and do all the "testing required by our agency, PADI. But we also take the "touring" seriously. We are fortunate to have a shop that does a lot of certifications and has a lot of DM's assistant instructors and intstuctors around who like to get in the water. We staff up and go 2 or 3 to one, and give our students some "real diving" in depths from 25 to 35 feet which with altitude adjustment, is actually like diving a little deeper and lends itself to a more meaningful discussion of pressure groups that the platform only approach. So with Jim, I say we need more, not less, and "convenience " is irrelevant. There is no substitute for bottom time in learning and growing as a competent diver.
DivemasterDennis
 
Which is why I think the checkout dives could be done in 1 day..........the student is no longer in the "learning mode" but in the "test mode"
a little learning theory coming up. A good assessment brings new learning for the student.
 
Going from two days of diving to one day screws the student out of dive time and here's why:

When we used to take open water students out for their checkout dives, not only did they have to do their skills out in the middle of the cove, but then one of us divemasters got to take them around and finish off our tanks in the form of a fun dive. We were only in 15 to 20 feet of water and most of the time there were enough divemasters at the dive that knew the instructor; they would hear he was doing a class up on the coast so they would volunteer to be an extra DM just because they liked the guy and it was fun.
So sometimes we had a ratio of 1:1 - as many people DM'ing as there were students.
After two full dives puttering around looking at nudibranchs and little fish and crabs plus skills on a line the students were tuckered out.
That's about two hours of diving and in 48 degree water in a wetsuit that's quite a bit for someone not used to it.
To try and do four dives in one day would really short them on a very valuable and enjoyable first time ocean experience. Even if they were able to do four dives in a day there would only be time to do the skills and that's it.
We like to mix learning and fun.
 

Back
Top Bottom