dumpsterDiver:
Isn't this what we hear from the fitness nuts: "If you increase your muscle mass, your basal metabolism will increase and you will be able to eat more and you will even burn more calories in your sleep!!!"
From the uninformed, but they are unfortunately wrong (some of the worst fitness myths spew forth from fitness "professionals" every day). Daily energy expenditure is most strongly correlated to total body mass, and not so much to body composition, meaning that gaining a pound of fat requires similar caloric expenditure to carry around as an extra pound of muscle.
Think about losing 30 pounds. Now, think about putting 30 pounds in a backpack and carrying that around with you all day. That's hard work that demands a lot of calories (and O2).
Now think about adding 10 pounds of muscle and only carrying 20 pounds in the backpack. Total body mass is the same- do you now burn more or fewer calories each day? Gaining muscle makes ordinary movements easier, and it seems that the overall effect washes out over the course of a day. Depending on the type of conditioning done, muscle can also *reduce* caloric expenditure at submaximal levels of activity.
But, this still supports your point that higher body mass means higher basal metabolism, all else equal. Keep in mind, though, that most divers concerned with SAC are probably far from their basal O2 consumption regardless of how big they are. There are many large, experienced divers with low SACs.
To this point, a bigger tank might allow longer bottom times, but it might be missing the issue. Efficient diving is more than just about bottom times- the more you work at depth, the faster you are loading inert gas. All of the hints about dive skills that have been raised here can lead to reduced gas loading, but a bigger tank does not.
Cameron