What you choose for an octo (I personally prefer 'alternate second stage'. 'Octo' seems to imply something different, which I don't personally agree with) is a matter of personal preference. Arguments are made for and against 'cheap', 'detuned', 'identical', 'streamlined', 'full size', 'compact', etc, etc.. But, I don't hear stories of divers regularly coming to grief because of the use of 'less than primary quality' alternate second stages. Having said that, like most I have MY preferences as well, which are probably evident in my comments, below.
mbs:
should we expect an octo to breath as easily as a primary?
Yes! Why not?
Are they generally not detuned to avoid freeflows?
No! Why should they be? Some are, but I see that as a matter of ignorance as much as anything. I have used identical primary and alternate second stages for years, in warm water, cold water, calm water, current, shallow water and deep water, and have never had a problem with a freeflow. I see absolutely no reason to 'detune'. Keep the venturi control lever in pre-dive mode? Yes. Dial down the user-adjustable breathing control / inhalation effort knob? Yes. Those are quickly changed when the alternate becomes the primary. I can't 're-tune' in-water.
mbs:
Lots of regs, primary or secondary breath differently.
Yes, and I want all my second stages to breath well, not just some of them
mbs:
why not have a full spare if you have the option!
Exactly. And, why would you not have that option? Some might say 'cost', which I don't consider a valid argument. If the cost differential between a cheap octo and a 'full' alternate second stage is too much for someone to afford, they probably should pick another recreation.
Worked fine for OOA drills until I stopped doing the "let the OOA diver grab for it and hope it works" type of reaction and went to the psychologically more beneficial "hand them a reg you and they both know works" type of response. . . . And I do not teach new divers to allow an OOA or LOA to grab for a reg. They are taught to donate the primary or octo. And for that reason I want a reg equal in performance to my primary. I might be the one using it.
YES! Well-stated, Jim.
I dive with Zeagle ZX second stages. I dive with Apeks ATX/XTX 50, 100 and 200 second stages. All are user adjustable (venturi control and cracking effort). I dive with identical second stages on my primary hose and my necklace hose, on both posts when diving backmount, manifolded doubles, and both bottles when diving sidemount. If I have to donate, what's in my mouth is what I use. Since that is also what I breath from almost all the time (OOAs are uncommon), I want it to breath very well. And, in the event it gets kicked out of my mouth by another diver (more common, it seems, that OOAs) or I need to donate it, I want my alternate sitting right below my mouth, and I want it to breath just as well. One difference between me and Jim, though - my Egress sat on a shelf for 5 years, new-in-box, and I finally 'sold' it back to the shop.
I am curious, what is your fascination with a '
a low profile design'? To paraphrase the question, is there any reason to consider it?