Pilot Fish got me thinking (ouch!) 
First, let me make clear my level of newbieness: I have passed OW and I went on one dive vacation consisting of eight dives with an experienced couple and a dive master (a really good divemaster in my opinion).
The couple I was with are experienced and generally went off on their own. They were seldom within 10 yards of me. In effect, they were not buddies to me. Seeing this on the irst dive I teneded to stick close to the DM on subsequent dives. It wasn't until the final day of diving that I realized I should stick REALLY close to the DM if we were to be of any use to each other.
So the other couple were off doing their own thing even though we had agreed to dive as a team. That means I was not there for them just as much as they were not there for me. My fault for not correcting that after the first dive.
The undercurrent to Pilot Fish's posts I think is "if you don't rely on your buddy because they are too far away, too distracted, too WHATEVER, then how can they POSSIBLY rely on YOU?" After all, if I can't get to my buddy's octo, chances are pretty darn good he can't get to mine either. I am as unreliable as he - BY DEFINITION. You are either both buddies or you are just two fish in the sea.
That's a very good point. How many of us think we are great buddies but our buddies (from the cattle boat or resort) are bozos? If I am not within arm's reach then you better order me some floppy shoes and a red nose as well (do fins count as clown shoes?).
This one post is certainly going to change the way I dive next time (just over a week away!). I WILL stick like glue and if the buddy doesn't like it then I'll get another one. (Actually I am likely to hire a guide for awhile but even then I will there side by side).
Thanks for the perspective Pilot Fish

First, let me make clear my level of newbieness: I have passed OW and I went on one dive vacation consisting of eight dives with an experienced couple and a dive master (a really good divemaster in my opinion).
The couple I was with are experienced and generally went off on their own. They were seldom within 10 yards of me. In effect, they were not buddies to me. Seeing this on the irst dive I teneded to stick close to the DM on subsequent dives. It wasn't until the final day of diving that I realized I should stick REALLY close to the DM if we were to be of any use to each other.
So the other couple were off doing their own thing even though we had agreed to dive as a team. That means I was not there for them just as much as they were not there for me. My fault for not correcting that after the first dive.
The undercurrent to Pilot Fish's posts I think is "if you don't rely on your buddy because they are too far away, too distracted, too WHATEVER, then how can they POSSIBLY rely on YOU?" After all, if I can't get to my buddy's octo, chances are pretty darn good he can't get to mine either. I am as unreliable as he - BY DEFINITION. You are either both buddies or you are just two fish in the sea.
That's a very good point. How many of us think we are great buddies but our buddies (from the cattle boat or resort) are bozos? If I am not within arm's reach then you better order me some floppy shoes and a red nose as well (do fins count as clown shoes?).
This one post is certainly going to change the way I dive next time (just over a week away!). I WILL stick like glue and if the buddy doesn't like it then I'll get another one. (Actually I am likely to hire a guide for awhile but even then I will there side by side).
Thanks for the perspective Pilot Fish