Blue Sparkle
Contributor
"There are many different bronze alloys but modern bronze is typically 88% copper and 12% tin."
"Bronze was especially suitable for use in boat and ship fittings prior to the wide employment of stainless steel owing to its combination of toughness and resistance to salt water corrosion. Bronze is still commonly used in ship propellers and submerged bearings."
Bronze - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Totally agreed Peter. And if you knew me from boating, you would know that I love bronze, and vastly prefer it to stainless steel. I'm a rabid bronze fan and often tout its wonders to the modern world that is infatuated with stainless (which I'm not so fond of in the boating realm)
But, although it is a wonderful underwater metal (and I have chosen it for my own boats' underwater/topside metal fittings), it will typically get growth on it unless painted with anti-fouling, at least on a boat in salt water. Maybe plaques are different - my experience is with vessels.
Edited to add: I happen to be chatting with some boaty friends and I'm asking their thoughts, which I will post here later.
Second edit: Okay, so I was chatting with some boat-related friends (two of whom were divers back in the old days) and we discussed the plaque materials. I was interested to get their opinions on copper, since I know it as an ingredient in anti-fouling paint and that it was used in "the old days" to sheath hulls, partially for those qualities.
So, one negative for copper is that a thinner piece of copper would likely "corrode" away in a relatively short time period (not days or weeks, but still... months or few years?); however they felt that one of 1/4" or more would likely last a long time. BUT, the copper would tend to be leached out, so the anti-fouling properties would not last as long (this makes sense, as it is leached out of bottom paint too, over time). I don't know what the time period would be.
Bronze (or as I like to call it, the King of Metals ), will foul, but will last a very long time. Longer than copper. And, since the fouling in northern California is not super bad (at least as I remember it in the Bay Area), it could probably be maintained by people cleaning it off from time to time.
Another idea that was floated was to apply clear epoxy to the plaque (this was bandied about while we were talking about copper). At 20' or deeper, I don't think UV would be an issue (epoxy is UV sensitive). I would be a little "meh" on that, myself, as I'm not really into a "plastic" or coated feel to a plaque (although I use epoxy for plenty of other things, so it's not that I'm anti-epoxy). Of course in this case my wishes aren't really applicable - I'm just mentioning what I'm thinking.
So, after thinking about it more, and discussing it with some buds, I probably would choose bronze, myself, even though it would foul to some extent. It will be more corrosion resistant than copper, and copper's anti-fouling properties would not last forever (I'm not sure how long they would last... maybe a few years?).
Topside, bronze will develop a green patina as it oxidizes (and this protects it to a certain extent - it's not a bad thing), but I'm not sure what it would do under water (because all of my underwater bronze has anti-fouling paint on it when it is in salt water, but then this is a higher fouling area). The verdigris wouldn't put me off as I think it's beautiful; I'm just mentioning it.
So, for someone who was just going to pipe in with a sentence or two a while back, I have rambled on. I hope you all don't mind. Also, although I have some experience with metals and salt water (boat related), I'm certainly no expert or metallurgist, and with the wide readership on this board, there are probably some of those here
Last edited: