You should be hawking those first two. Centerfold material.
The surface conditions can really make it tough to *breath up* and get relaxed before your descent.
can't wait to see the rest!
How did you get the kelp to look so soft and yet keep her so sharp? (#2) Is that natural or are you selectively treating different areas of the image? Because that is a very beautiful effect. Your lighting looks supberb. I hate you. Those images really make me want to be there.
Is she not relying on a snorkel on the free dives? ..and what do you guys do at the surface?
Me hawking my shots? I wouldn't even know where to begin.
I'm an artist, not a marketing guy.
I shoot for me - I don't enter contests, I post all my stuff in the SoCal rooms (not the major rooms or photo rooms), I don't put my stuff out there for critique or evaluation, I don't belong to a photo club or photo society, I don't go to meetings, I don't take classes.
I dive.
I shoot.
With everything that is within me, I try to remain pure. Its all an artist can do. I don't get photo magazines, I don't belong to photo websites, I don't read photo news letters, I don't own a single book on photography. I've never taken a photo class, I've never taken a photoshop class, seminar, webinar or sat through some speaker at a trade show. I couldn't name the pioneers of underwater photography, I don't get scuba magazines or travel magazines.
I dive.
I shoot.
Has this cloistered isolationism held me back? Oh yes. I'm sure it has. I have so much to still learn, and although my learning curve is pretty vertical, the footholds and handholds come slowly because I do all of this on my own.
The trade off is my stuff is pure. I'm not trying to impress anyone but me. I'm not shooting to get placement, I'm not shooting to get fame, I'm not shooting to get paid, I'm not shooting so my club will respect me.
I shoot because what I see down there in my cold water SoCal Pacific is beautiful, and its nearly always mis-represented, homogenized, filtered, dumbed down or simply ignored by most other photographers.
I want the people who find my stuff to see what I see down there.
My website has HUGE images (1200 DPI) so can actually see the images. None of that thumbnail BS or worse - loading up each image with my name or watermark. Come to my site, you see images. Large, clear images. I don't have an equipment section on my site. Nobody cares how the sausage is made. I'm serious here. The websites of most "photographers" are woefully lacking, IMO. It has to be about the images, not about the photographer.
When you ask about selective manipulation - I have to laugh. I don't even know how to use multiple layers, let alone selectively manipulate stuff, Catherine.
When you see a shot of mine, you're seeing what I saw. The colors are genuine, the scene is actual, the critters were really there.
I'm an artist, not a technician.
I am a photo shop dummy. That pic looks very misty on the edges because the viz was not very good that day. She's sharp and the colors stronger because she's close and the strobes lit her up - the edges are off in the misty distance, well out of strobe's reach... so they're misty and muted.
I do very, very little in PS. Its all lighting and manual settings in the camera, selecting my POV carefully, planning and execution. And a little luck.
As to the snorkel - yes, she is using one. She tucked it under the rash guard before each descent. She pulled it out on the way up and used it on the surface.
Thanks for the kind words. I work really hard at this - hundreds of dives a year, tens-of-thousands of images a year. If you see something different in my stuff, then its working.
Thanks again, Cath - means a lot to me.
---
Ken