First of all, I've reported in the other thread on a discussion I've had with prominent Bali/Lembongan dive industry leaders. One of my questions was specifically whether a code of conduct might help the situation at Lembongan. I was told that this is one of the ideas, but it's a slow process fraught with floating mines that can so easily blow up to damage one's business that the operators who really "care" are hesitant to get explicitly involved (IOW, to lead the effort). Trying to do this will require a leader in the industry who has the respect of the rest of the local industry as well as the contacts in the public sector in order to help get things done who is willing to spearhead the work. For whoever steps up, this will take time and energy that will no longer be available to run his/her business. When somebody with sufficient stature does step up, we (visiting divers and local dive industry professionals alike) will owe her/him a debt of gratitude, regardless of the eventual outcome.
Next, the Japanese woman is being cremated today. As I mentioned above, this time the operator involved is a well-regarded one from Tulamben. Once the healing process begins, we may learn more about what happened during the dive, and we may be able to think through some of the events leading to the accident. I'm certain that the owner of this op is wracked with pain at the loss of his diver.
For an example of what might be useful to know, it's my impression that this may have been a private charter group rather than a join-in group. In a private charter, it's often the case that there are very mixed experience levels. It's harder to vet a boatload of people when somebody else is gathering them and charters the trip than it is when you book the divers as join-ins. But I don't know for certain that it was a charter, and if so, whether any vetting criteria were used by the organizer when booking the divers into the group. It's a simple question and not an accusation, but it's definitely food for thought.
Finally, as to whether it's potentially harmful to place regulatory limits on how many/who dives where/when on Penida, I have two thoughts:
1) How much harm to the local dive industry do these too-frequent deaths cause?
2) The dive industry at Malaysia's Sipadan area has seen continual growth (to the extent of more and more resorts mushrooming up on Mabul Island) even though very stringent limits are placed on the premier dive sites there.
Next, the Japanese woman is being cremated today. As I mentioned above, this time the operator involved is a well-regarded one from Tulamben. Once the healing process begins, we may learn more about what happened during the dive, and we may be able to think through some of the events leading to the accident. I'm certain that the owner of this op is wracked with pain at the loss of his diver.
For an example of what might be useful to know, it's my impression that this may have been a private charter group rather than a join-in group. In a private charter, it's often the case that there are very mixed experience levels. It's harder to vet a boatload of people when somebody else is gathering them and charters the trip than it is when you book the divers as join-ins. But I don't know for certain that it was a charter, and if so, whether any vetting criteria were used by the organizer when booking the divers into the group. It's a simple question and not an accusation, but it's definitely food for thought.
Finally, as to whether it's potentially harmful to place regulatory limits on how many/who dives where/when on Penida, I have two thoughts:
1) How much harm to the local dive industry do these too-frequent deaths cause?
2) The dive industry at Malaysia's Sipadan area has seen continual growth (to the extent of more and more resorts mushrooming up on Mabul Island) even though very stringent limits are placed on the premier dive sites there.