drrich2
Contributor
Ironically I see controversial reactions to perceived 'over-reach' from both sides of the issue on the medical questionnaires.
1.) Many individuals check 'no' to everything because they do not believe they will be dealt with fairly, reasonably and respectfully (and there are real world reports to back that up!). I'm thinking of people with mild to moderate hypertension well-controlled on meds. or who smoked a joint 6 months ago, not epileptics at known ongoing risk for seizures. Not everyone has the same concept of 'reasonably.'
2.) Then we have dive op.s fearful of serious harm (even if they win) from insane lawsuits like @boulderjohn and @Aura mentioned, and the physicians and perhaps nurse practitioners the liability risk bag gets punted to tasked to sign off on medical clearances, when at least in the U.S. the threat of malpractice suits is an ever present threat and most aren't familiar with diving.
I think both sides act in accordance with their own perceived best interests, and get accused of selfish over-reach.
It's worth noting there are plenty of scenarios I doubt any of us would disagree about. If customers are loading onto the dive boat, I don't think active epileptics, diabetics whose blood sugar that morning is in the 400's or asthmatics trying to mask wheezing after heavy inhaler use just prior to boarding are people any of us would advocate to be on the boat. On the other hand, if someone did a joint 4 1/2 years ago (to use @dmaziuk example) and checks 'no,' even if you are a stickler on principle, I doubt you see much risk for other divers.
1.) Many individuals check 'no' to everything because they do not believe they will be dealt with fairly, reasonably and respectfully (and there are real world reports to back that up!). I'm thinking of people with mild to moderate hypertension well-controlled on meds. or who smoked a joint 6 months ago, not epileptics at known ongoing risk for seizures. Not everyone has the same concept of 'reasonably.'
2.) Then we have dive op.s fearful of serious harm (even if they win) from insane lawsuits like @boulderjohn and @Aura mentioned, and the physicians and perhaps nurse practitioners the liability risk bag gets punted to tasked to sign off on medical clearances, when at least in the U.S. the threat of malpractice suits is an ever present threat and most aren't familiar with diving.
I think both sides act in accordance with their own perceived best interests, and get accused of selfish over-reach.
It's worth noting there are plenty of scenarios I doubt any of us would disagree about. If customers are loading onto the dive boat, I don't think active epileptics, diabetics whose blood sugar that morning is in the 400's or asthmatics trying to mask wheezing after heavy inhaler use just prior to boarding are people any of us would advocate to be on the boat. On the other hand, if someone did a joint 4 1/2 years ago (to use @dmaziuk example) and checks 'no,' even if you are a stickler on principle, I doubt you see much risk for other divers.