scubaozy
Contributor
Its both time and depth, did you not learn O2 exposure table? At 1.4, you will have 150 mins exposure allowance per day.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
yes at this particular shop its not a hassle, at least not to me. I take what I can get in NY since its not a huge diving hub lol. it is not pre banked so I think any mix needs to be "custom" blended. That is partial pressure blending correct?Can you get 36-40% without much hassle? Shops here usually charge a labor fee, plus the gas cost. Plus the 45 min drive each way at least. You have to drop tanks and come back another day. Not worth it. I’ll just take banked 32% which is readily available.
thanks for sharing, how does one determine the gradient factor? do only some computers track it?At 30-40ft the risk of DCS is so low that 40% is pointless. Mexico cave divers do 2-3 hour dives with average depths in that range using 32% and end with a surface gradient factor (how close they are to the deco required line) of under 10%.
I trie not to push anything regardless of gas being used, but that is a good point. thanks. Thought about a second computer to run on air while one is on Nitrox for this reasonIf you go to the limit of NDL for the gas, then you are spending more time under for the same nitrogen load for a person using air going to the air NDL, and your surface intervals will be the same.
very good point, I have been thinking about running two computers. one air one Nitrox for this reasonAir or nitrox, if you're pushing your NDLs, you're nitrogen loading is high. However, diving a safe nitrox mix for your depths, while using air NDLs for the dive, would be how you finish the dive with a 'safer' nitrogen loading.
Yes the course I took does include exposure. But I am talking about pulmonary toxicity. not CNS. This specific course was very vague about pulmonary.Its both time and depth, did you not learn O2 exposure table? At 1.4, you will have 150 mins exposure allowance per day.
Diving a standard mix like 32% makes it easier to familiarize yourself with ndls for that gas over a range of depths and also makes it easy to coordinate diving the same gasses when diving with buddies/teammates. Diving best mix might also mean you end up with a gas that's too hot if you end up getting redirected elsewhere than where you planned to go.Hello all I am looking for some feedback on my personal diving habits with Nitrox, and to see if my view point on it is incorrect?
Apart from extended NDLs I personally use Nitrox for its potential to reduce nitrogen loading thus contributing to DSC. I am certified up to the standard 40%, and I use as rich as a mix as I can regarding the MOD. For example I am doing dive with a max depth of 30-40ft, and had a cylinder filled as close to 40% as possible it came out to 39.8%. the mod of 40% at a pp02 of 1.4 is 82 ft. My point of view is get the mix as rich as possible as long as its not pushing the MOD at 1.4pp02, and spend the extra money for the extra safety margin, but this practice of using such rich fills seems few and far between. looking at the log book after my fill, it was mostly all 32% with one 36%. It seems like most people just go with the standard 32% even if (in my opinion) their mix cold be richer because they are nowhere near their mod.
The MOD of 40% at 1.4pp02 is around 82 ft, wouldn't using a 40% mix under that depth be a more conservative approach? so if your diving to a Max of 60 why not use 40%? I know DCS in rec is rare, but doesn't it make sense to use rich mixes when the dive allows to add in possible safety? why not be as safe as possible?
Does using a mix like 39-40% pose a substantially bigger risk to Low pressure oxygen toxicity (pulmonary oxygen toxicity), the the standard 32% even if the MOD is not pushed? If someone would be able to enlighten me more about this condition and how common it is with rich nitrox, that would be helpful.
when diving How close to 1.4pp02 will you allow yourself to get? I have never pushed it personally, but how close to 1.4pp02 do you find yourself on dives? do you go right up to it?
Is my logic on using rich mixes valid? Does anyone else share the same view point as me and also go as rich as possible? am I missing something? let me know in the comments, thanks !!
When I dive at home, I dive best mix as my favorite local shop blends. $12/tank for a cave filled custom mix is YAY! At destinations like Cozumel, Roatan, FL Keys, etc finding shops that will mix for you is either not possible or ridiculously expensive. Therefore when I travel, I just dive whatever nitrox is being banked. In the Keys it tends to be 30%. In Cozumel and Roatan it was 32%. Supposedly some shops bank 36% but I haven't seen one yet.Hello all I am looking for some feedback on my personal diving habits with Nitrox, and to see if my view point on it is incorrect?
Apart from extended NDLs I personally use Nitrox for its potential to reduce nitrogen loading thus contributing to DSC. I am certified up to the standard 40%, and I use as rich as a mix as I can regarding the MOD. For example I am doing dive with a max depth of 30-40ft, and had a cylinder filled as close to 40% as possible it came out to 39.8%. the mod of 40% at a pp02 of 1.4 is 82 ft. My point of view is get the mix as rich as possible as long as its not pushing the MOD at 1.4pp02, and spend the extra money for the extra safety margin, but this practice of using such rich fills seems few and far between. looking at the log book after my fill, it was mostly all 32% with one 36%. It seems like most people just go with the standard 32% even if (in my opinion) their mix cold be richer because they are nowhere near their mod.
The MOD of 40% at 1.4pp02 is around 82 ft, wouldn't using a 40% mix under that depth be a more conservative approach? so if your diving to a Max of 60 why not use 40%? I know DCS in rec is rare, but doesn't it make sense to use rich mixes when the dive allows to add in possible safety? why not be as safe as possible?
Does using a mix like 39-40% pose a substantially bigger risk to Low pressure oxygen toxicity (pulmonary oxygen toxicity), the the standard 32% even if the MOD is not pushed? If someone would be able to enlighten me more about this condition and how common it is with rich nitrox, that would be helpful.
when diving How close to 1.4pp02 will you allow yourself to get? I have never pushed it personally, but how close to 1.4pp02 do you find yourself on dives? do you go right up to it?
Is my logic on using rich mixes valid? Does anyone else share the same view point as me and also go as rich as possible? am I missing something? let me know in the comments, thanks !!