Good on them, I think students are willing, and capable, but for whatever reason the two OW classes I took were not equipping us to be neutrally buoyant divers.
Students will shoot for the bar they are given. They will assume it is normal. If the bar is low, that's what they will shoot for and stop. If it is high, the same. I think many instructors underestimate the desire of students to do well.
When we went for our first OW environment training, one of the couples was up & down several times from shallow 10-20 ft depths in uncontrolled ascents because they were just unprepared. The pool work was rushed, covered too many topics, and it was clear to me that everyone would be better off spending a day just learning/practicing to control neutral buoyancy instead of a rush through the bullet points the instructor had.
Likely due to overweighting. None of us have great awareness when we start out. We often don't realize when we change depth. So that extra wing displacement that is for the excess weight results in even great changes in buoyancy force when we go up or down. And that often results in corking and cratering. It isn't their fault, but the instructors. It was certainly my fault when I started teaching, as on the knees was how I learned to teach. As soon as I followed the examples of others and experimented with proper weighting, neutral buoyancy, and trim, the results I achieved were dramatically different.
And this isn't brain surgery. It isn't hard. But you can't handicap students with excess weight and improperly distributed weight and expect good results.
After my OW cert I didn't dive because I just didn't feel capable without supervision, and even after a refresher I didn't feel like I was practiced enough on how to dive safely without an instructor nearby. It wasn't just me, it was the same for others.
That is unfortunately quite common. That was one reason why I wrote that ridiculous dive planning document that you can find in the links in my signature. I say ridiculous as it was never intended to be used often. It was only meant to be used to establish confidence in divers and not need to have their hands held (a violation of WRSTC guidelines)
"Advanced" is a misnomer. Many of these "skills" really are just part of basic scuba diving. If anything, maybe the class should be called open water part 2.
Oh please, not this issue again. While you are 100% right, marketing rules here. This is after all, a business and that means profits before results/safety. If the industry clamped down on instructor quality, it would hemorrhage from the loss of dive pro dues.
@boulderjohn 's article on moving to NB was over a decade ago, and the changes in that direction have been miniscule and only occurring recently. While I do believe the industry will get there, I think it will still take a couple decades.