Is criticism of Moderators a bannable offense?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

almitywife:
do the pretty ones every realize they are being chatted up??? :D


I PMed you last night too sweetheart :D :10:
 
MB:
I frequently declare how pretty I am; its just not a widespread view.
Dude,
Look in the mirror. Like me you ARE a widespread view! :rofl3::rofl3::rofl3:
 
wardric:
What about the creation vs evolution thread then? (4022 posts, 152 by Lamont ;))
Religion and science - permitted

wardric:
or the Global warming one? Where do we draw the line?
Economics and science - permitted

Save the whales - can't they'll cut of Doc's whale steak supply.:D
 
H2Andy:
you are being told over and over again that you have a communications problem. what you do in the back is not translating to the members up front.

what you do with that information is up to you. you can dismiss it (as it appears you are doing) or you could think about it and see if it makes sense to do anything about it.
Its good input, and Marvel has said - frequently (albeit not a good indicator of "widespread") that she'll advance the questions.

H2Andy:
you are not being perceived as you think you are.

That assumes that "we" are of like mind of that perception. Or that we each a different perception of it. Or the biggest challenge of all - that there is actually tremendous variation in how different members perceive the staff - or whether they even think about this at all.
 
photohikedive:
along this vein, you raise a valid point. I think the people who wonder how the policing is done, are only the ones who have been policed.


No. Not at all. If that were the case, I wouldn't get as many pm's from the "silent ones" as Andy put it. No Almity they are not flirting but thank you for the compliment :hugs: Besides some are women... we will leave it at that ;)

Look nobody is asking for my opinion on how to manage a business but since I have nothing else to do right now..... :D How you are perceived is terribly important - especially if you want to further this board - if that is what you are truly committed to doing. Sitting back and ignoring the user/problems is a bad business practice.

Recently, to my mortification, I was banned from viewing a particular user. Besides not being able to view the user's posts I was not allowed to view any thread they had started or any post by any person in the thread. The reason I bring this up is that I was not informed of this punishment. It just happened. I didn't run off and start a thread or anything - as it is kind of the way things get done often times around here. Now after a long period, I did finally ask it be lifted, as it seemed as though it would have gone on forever.
 
Missdirected:
No. Not at all. If that were the case, I wouldn't get as many pm's from the "silent ones" as Andy put it. No Almity they are not flirting. Besides some are women... we will leave it at that ;)

Look nobody is asking for my opinion on how to manage a business but since I have nothing else to do right now..... :D How you are perceived is terribly important - especially if you want to further this board - if that is what you are truly committed to doing. Sitting back and ignoring the user/problems is a bad business practice.

Recently, to my mortification, I was banned from viewing a particular user. Besides not being able to view the user's posts I was not allowed to view any thread they had started or any post by any person in the thread. The reason I bring this up is that I was not informed of this punishment. It just happened.
Is that possible? Wow, that must be some nifty programming. :eyebrow:

Seriously, I'd have thought a PM would have accompanied such a punishment even it was to simply inform rather than to explain why.
 
Far_X:
Is that possible? Wow, that must be some nifty programming. :eyebrow:

Seriously, I'd have thought a PM would have accompanied such a punishment even it was to simply inform rather than to explain why.

No. Nothing. I was not told of it or when it would end. It just happened.

btw, I have missed you. Glad to see you here.
 
I swear Miss D it's not my fault, I had nothing to do with it this time.. . . :D
 
MB:
That assumes that "we" are of like mind of that perception. Or that we each a different perception of it. Or the biggest challenge of all - that there is actually tremendous variation in how different members perceive the staff - or whether they even think about this at all.

lol ...

see? you don't even know how you guys are perceived. only someone unfamiliar with how you are perceived up front would say something like that

you're arguing Hegelian dialectics when the conversation going on is about customer satisfaction

:eyebrow:

alright... look ... i've already spent way too much time on this serious stuff

you all carry on ... being is the same as non-being ... and both are becoming ... something ... but the process is the same, baby

One through nine, no maybes, no supposes, no fractions. You can't travel in space, you can't go out into space, you know, without, like, you know, uh, with fractions - what are you going to land on - one-quarter, three-eighths? What are you going to do when you go from here to Venus or something? That's dialectic physics.
 
Missdirected:
No. Nothing. I was not told of it or when it would end. It just happened.

btw, I have missed you. Glad to see you here.
Maybe the system just messed up. ;)

Aw shucks. :blinking: I have been stuck in an igloo. I was taking a shower and with temperatures being so low, the water froze and I was trapped inside the cubicle. Serves me right for sleeping with the window open. :rofl3:
 

Back
Top Bottom