- Messages
- 16,616
- Reaction score
- 5,400
- # of dives
- 1000 - 2499
I see what you're saying and don't disagree--especially with your experience vs. the little I had. I would ask how was the general ability of your AOW student in water--comfortability, swimming, time spent in water before OW course? After OW being taught on the bottom, it wasn't many dives later I did the PPB course and had no trouble doing the tricks (through the hoops, spinning, etc.). I certainly agree that buoyancy control after being taught neutrally is much better than if skills are taught on the bottom (I couldn't kneel--cramps, so one foot ahead, one behind). I saw the big difference the last year or so that I assisted. The instructors spent a lot more time on buoyancy, even if some skills were still taught kneeling, some not. This seemed to be the way the shop and PADI was heading.I feel I did a huge disservice to my students whom I taught on their knees when they first started diving. And those who continued onto AOW with me struggled with their buoyancy. I honestly feel like I violated standards, as I followed how things were being done at the shop where I first taught. Moving onto another shop, I started teaching midwater immediately and the results in buoyancy control between the students I taught on the knees and midwater is staggering. I've had to do a lot of remedial work with one AOW student whom I taught on the knees. It took him quite a while to meet the performance requirements of the PPB adventure dive (almost 20 attempts), but that's my fault. I gave him a poor foundation, and I own that. Fortunately it is now fixed, but I had to work really hard at it. I wouldn't have if he had been taught properly in his OW class.