I've been doing a little research since seeing this thread to try to find out the awful truth about hoses. The hoses I've seen advertised specifically for air breathing claim to be made from medical grade PVC whereas the air tool hoses are supposedly made from standard PVC. I've been trying to find out what makes medical grade PVC just so medical grade. Does it
have to fit a specific set of rules or can anyone call their PVC 'medical grade' as a marketing tool?
The Hookah hoses are made to comply with the following Australian Standard;
AS2299 - Occupational Diving Operations
3.12.5.9 Diver's Hose
A diver's hose shall -
(a) be of one continuous length
(b) be kink resistant
(c) incorporate a non-return valve located as close as possible to the diver (e.g. at the breathing medium inlet to the incompressible helmet or full face mask, or as the mouthpiece, or fitted as an integral part of the incompressible helmet or full-face mask).
(d) to be designed specially for conditions experienced in diving
(e) have a burst pressure defined as the pressure at which that hose (or another identical hose) has burst, when pressure tested as the maximum operating temperature; and
(f) not be used for the conveyance of the breathing medium, where the pressure of the breathing medium exceeds one quarter of the burst pressure specified in item (e).
I guess item (d) is up to interpretation. Remember, these are
standards, not laws. I'd like to hope that not causing the diver to die is a good condition to meet.
I spent a good couple of hours trolling through various standards related to pneumatic hoses, high pressure hoses, low pressure hoses, medical hoses, diving, medical manufacturing and air tools. They all mention hose materials must be 'suitable for the intended application' but none had requirements any more specific than this.
A concerning observation was that some specify extremely specific test procedures and quantifiable requirements relating to mechanical strength (minimum tensile strength, expansion under pressure, etc) flow rate (85 L/min in one case) and chemical resistance (mostly oil and oxygen) but none gave recommendations related to chemical pollution when breathing.
It's entirely likely there is a standard I just can't find related to this.
OK, so very little (if any) diving equipment is probably made to Australian Standards, but do not have access to ISO or any other standards database to this will have to do. Generally Australian Standards meet or exceed ISO standards so I'd have expected that if any standards include chemical pollution statements, it'd be in AS.
But on a much less analytical level, in Australia I can buy a 3/8" x 20m industrial air hose for $41. A Hookah 10mm x 20m breathing hose is $55. For $14 I'd be putting my skepticism aside and buying the one which at least claims to be safe for breathing.