Blue Sparkle, I read that is true when using a computer but I was taught (I think) that the total time (surface to surface) was to be used for calculations.
....Maybe with the computer you get a little more time. Which is good, I guess..
Jim
The way I understand it is this:
A) On dive tables (at least the PADI ones that I know), the figures given are for Bottom Time. This is all the time from when you first start descending until you begin your ascent.
B) On (many? all?) computers, Dive Time is measured, which is
all the time from when you first start descending until you surface again.
So to take the OP's computer time for his fateful dives (which apparently it calls BT but which actually measures Dive Time), and compare it directly to the tables doesn't work, because the tables count bottom time. That made a difference of about 6 minutes on his first dive. It would be an even larger difference on my similar dives because I ascended slower, did a deep stop, and then made a longer safety stop.
The computer does give you "more time" in a way, because it is measuring what you are actually doing. Say you go down to 100', then after a few minutes come up to 60' and toodle around for a while, and then to 30' and toodle around, and
then ascend.... well using tables that diving time before your last ascent would all be "100' bottom time," so it would count for "more." That's because the tables don't know your profile.
But I think it's slightly two different things.
1) Simply how you notate the time (Bottom time vs. Total Dive time).
2) The ability of the computer to know that you are making a multi-level dive, and thus to not have to choose "max depth" to use as the guiding factor.
(Maybe the PADI RDP addresses that - I don't know as I have only ever used "regular" tables or a computer.) (I think many dives that would be fine on the computer would put you into NDL on the tables, because of the tables assumption that you are doing a "square" dive.)