victorzamora
Contributor
Well, to quote an earlier post, that's just dumb.
I knew you’d see it my way
I couldn't agree more.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Well, to quote an earlier post, that's just dumb.
I knew you’d see it my way
I couldn't agree more.
So....I got curious. Obviously the NACD website doesn't have anything (althought I checked). However, the Wiki page does. Not the most up-to-date thing ever, but the excerpt below explicitly states that "[Intro to Cave] is designed to help hone those skills previously learned in cavern. New skills and procedures are taught which are needed for limited single tank cave penetration."I won’t bother to even search for current NACD standards, but when I did my Basic/Intro training, you were expected to be in Single tank.
I think the Ginnie rule was a bit of a knee jerk to the recent-ish incident in there. I think that the Peacock incident was more easy to ignore as it was a violation of standards and a personal mistake as opposed to the Ginnie violation of "standards" that would be taught in a class that person didn't take. I don't think that a DPV class will always teach you to be responsible/competent, and even a well-taught class doesn't always lead to competent/responsible diving. Even today, I'd say that most cave diving deaths are either medical or caused by a violation of the simplest rules we're all taught.I find it interesting that Ginnie one trusts Intro divers to limit to 1/6th, but I can’t even scooter to the Maple Leaf without a cave/DPV card. ....and I know that we’ve had dpv gas management fatalities. But I’m pretty sure we’ve had intro gas mgt accidents too, where I appears 1/6th rule was violated. Peacock 2016?