Hypothesis on Poor Vis and GW's

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

drbill

The Lorax for the Kelp Forest
Scuba Legend
Rest in Peace
Messages
22,824
Reaction score
6,070
Location
Santa Catalina Island, CA
# of dives
2500 - 4999
I drafted the following for my newspaper column column "Dive Dry with Dr. Bill." It is what it states... a hypothesis, unproven and untested that suggests possible causes for the horrible visibility in SoCal and the increase in sightings of great whites.

I'd be interested in comments from anyone on ScubaBoard since it will not go to press for two weeks. Thanks

Dr. Bill


DIVE DRY WITH DR. BILL: MY HYPOTHESIS ABOUT THIS SUMMER

This is one summer I would have preferred to spend in Hawaii or Thailand or the Caribbean. The water is warm and clear there. Not only did our local economy dip a bit, the diving conditions were the worst I can remember in 35 years of on-again-off-again diving on Catalina. Long-term divers I've spoken with agree. If I didn't have to get my gills wet every few days, I might not have dived most of the summer. Of course I also have to keep my dive buddies happy, don't I ladies?

Local and visiting divers have asked me, as a marine biologist, why we're experiencing such poor visibility and winter-like temperatures. This weekend I was lucky to see 10-12 feet ahead of me and the temperature dipped to 55 degrees on one dive- and I wasn't that deep. This time of year we should be experiencing our warmest waters and good visibility. After months of watching this nonsense, I have formed a hypothesis that not only explains the conditions but also the increased sightings of great white sharks. Read on.

A scientific hypothesis is actually just a theory based on a set of experiences in the "real" world. I'm referring to underwater, not the world of jobs and commerce... of which I obviously know little. One takes a set of observations and formulates a theory to explain the causes. My Funk & Wagnalls (yes, I actually own one) defines an hypothesis as "an unproved scientific conclusion drawn from known facts." "Let's look at the facts, ma'am," as Sergeant (Detective) Friday used to say.

The poor visibility ("vis" in diver terminology) appears to be caused by plant material such as phytoplankton due to the strong green color. Phytoplankton blooms are not uncommon along our coast as daylength increases and colder waters bring nutrients from deeper water. Plants need sunlight and nutrients (marine plants already have plenty of water of course). Normally these blooms last a week or two. This year they seem to have lasted forever. Why? Water temperatures were abnormally low earlier this summer. Colder water contains more nutrients than warmer water. Therefore abundant nutrients in the water column and increasing daylength allowed longer plankton blooms.

As the summer progressed, surface temperatures suddenly jumped up 5-10 degrees in a short time (two weeks). This warming should have resulted in depleted nutrients. However we had a thermocline (the abrupt boundary between warm and cold water masses) that was fairly shallow- as little as 17 feet based on my dive computer readings. This thermocline rose and fell throughout the entire summer. When cold water rose higher, it replenished nutrients in the surface waters and maintained the plankton bloom for weeks on end. Visibility has generally been worse in the upper 40-60 feet wher sunlight is strongest.

We've also had a lot of surge throughout the summer, not just during hurricane season off Baja. At times I've felt I was in a winter storm underwater with strong surge tearing seaweeds, even large ones, from the rocks. The rapid increase in water temperature in August also triggered a quick die-off of kelp near the surface, a natural but usually slower process during the gradual warming in a normal summer. Lots of seaweed and kelp detritus covered the ocean floor where it was ground into small particles by the surge and abrasion. This explains the presence of a lot of particulates in the water in addition to phytoplankton, further decreasing "vis."

So how do the great white sharks fit in? Poor visibility appears to cover much of the southern California coast and extends almost to San Clemente Island (they had 100 foot visibility a short while ago). Now even when I'm diving in the Dive Park under low vis, I often have to surface to get my bearings since I can't see my usual landmarks if they are more than 10 feet away. Perhaps the great whites are experiencing a similar problem and need to surface to get their bearings... or their sea lions. This may also help explain the fatal attack at Avila Beach.

Of course hypotheses should be tested using the scientific method before being accepted as scientific "fact." Should some foundation wish to fund the research, say to the tune of a quarter million dollars (okay, how about $25,000? a measely $250???), I'd be happy to test this hypothesis. Makes more sense than funding research to prove whether reducing the minimum wage creates more jobs... or just more poverty. Until my hypothesis is properly tested, it will remain my educated opinion. Take it or leave it.


© 2003 Dr. Bill Bushing. Watch the "Dive Dry with Dr. Bill" underwater videos on Catalina Cable TV channel 49, 10:00 AM and 5:00 PM weekdays.
 
That's a fascinating theory, though I'm pretty sure sharks navigate with more than their eyesight.
In any event, when will this all revert to normal if your hypothesis is correct?
 
...but I am not so sure about it.

This spring and summer have been characterized by very strange weather patterns in much of the Northern Hemisphere. Western Europe had summerlike weather in early spring and unprecedented heat and draught in most of the summer. The US midwest had a very cool and wet summer (which was actually very nice...). All of this was caused by unusual patterns in the Jetstream.

I believe (and now I am theorizing) that these are usually caused by ocean streams and my guess is that the same ocean streams that caused the Jetstream to behave strangely, are also responsible for the conditions in SoCal. Your observations of strong currents, low temperature and poor visibility (usually this is caused by nutrient rich upwellings) fit in well.

Whatever the cause I don't think poor visibility is in any way related to shark attacks. Sharks hunt primarily using their sense of smell and electrical fields.

Dr. RB
 
I too found this year to be a strange summer in the California waters, regarding poor viz.,and high water temp. until the thermocline. In the northern Channel Islands, it also seemed like there were frequent sightings of pelagic species that usually inhabit southern waters; most notably yellowtail and bluefin tuna. Prior to the shark attack in Avila, I've had friends report that there seemed to be "more than usual amount" of schooling baitfish, porpoise, and seals in Avila's cove. I'm wondering if these sightings have to do with food supply at a the basic level. I have no professional credentials in marine biology, but am interested in the subject and look forward to reading your article. Where will it be published?
Thanks,
JAW
 
Bill, interesting theory about the viz.

As to the sharks, are you sure they're not simply following the food chain? The abundance of planktons means plenty of food for the smaller fish that gets eaten by the bigger fish. Wouldn't that, combined with the cold water and the shallow thermocline, explain the shark activity (assuming there actually is one)?
 
I have to agree with Arnaud. It is a much more parsimonious theory and according to good scientific practice the simplest explanation is usually yhe correct one.
 
if those "shark summers" of my East Coast childhood (think Amity) corresponded with the local version of red tide, but I am drawing a blank.
 
Certainly larger scale phenomena like ocean currents are the ultimate cause of the events. This is just a regional explanation of the specifics.

Yes, sharks feed using their other senses. However, my understanding is that they normally cruise at deeper depths and strike upwards towards the surface. If they can't sense food visually due to plankton, I'm suggesting they might cruise in much shallower waters.

Not even suggesting there are MORE sharks this year (which may be true), just that there are more sightings due to presence in shallower depths.

Will be interesting to see how the big picture evolves over time.

Dr. Bill
 
drbill once bubbled...
...Will be interesting to see how the big picture evolves over time...

And I hope we will, unless...:shark:
 
My buddy and I decided to hit the beach today. Loaded up the car with gear, and headed to Palos Verdes. Went down to the Old Marineland site.

Red Tide.

We then proceded to drive up the coast, checking every mile or so.

Way up the coast.

We finally stopped at the wreck of the La Genelle, just above Port Hueneme.

Red Tide.

Up the entire coast. Red Tide. The water looked like coffee, every single place. We did not see a single divable spot covering what, 70 miles of coastline? (Didn't see any Great Whites, either.)

This sucks. :upset:
 

Back
Top Bottom