- Messages
- 7,660
- Reaction score
- 4,717
- # of dives
- 200 - 499
Your opinion is just as valid as mine. They are both just that, opinions.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Your opinion is just as valid as mine. They are both just that, opinions.
...//... it is all the other stuff I pointed out where certain people went beyond opinion to action or advocating action against this diver. ...//...
If everyone in your state reveres these creatures so much, then why don't the laws of your state reflect it? According to the website of the Washington Fish and Game Commission it is legal to take octopi year round all areas except marine area 12. You can even keep one if snagged on a fishing lure which I find a bit odd.
So, tell me where you all are right and I am wrong.
Steve, this is the exact argument that defeated lawyers use when they are about to lose their case due to lack of concrete evidence. When they have no legal leg to stand on they try to divert the attention of the jury to other aspects of the persons life which may seem out of the ordinary. "Casey Anthony went dancing, Casey Anthony was a bi-sexual Casey Anthony was an alcoholic!" By the end of the day, it is not up to divers to self-appoint themselves as behavior police for other divers.
The d-bag in question, upon being confronted for taking the octopus, said in sum and substance: " you, I'm taking whatever I want from here, I'll take from here again just to piss you off, and there's not a damn thing you can do to me for it! Nanny nanny boo boo!"
Well, that got a response. And the only reason the response was as virulent and effective as it was is because of (a) his attitude to Bob and in his initial posts on Facebook defending himself, and (b) his public social media postings of other frankly disgusting activities that were quickly brought to light.
He asked for this, and he got it as bad as he did only because of how he'd presented himself before and after the GPO kill. Aside from real, legally-cognizable threats that were made to him or his family (neither of which I think anyone here was involved in), he deserved all that he got even though it's going to hurt him for some time to come.
So he asked for a man twice his age and a large number of total strangers to engage in a vendetta against him. And that makes it all right. I wasn't there and I know I have a temper but I hope I would have taken a different, perhaps higher road and would not have engaged him at his level.
So many missed opportunities to make a lot of people a lot better off.
R/S,
db
Feel free to weep over missed opportunities all you like; I'll save my sympathy for people who don't cop an attitude of 'I'll kill more stuff just because I know you want me not to.'
He asserted his legal rights as a sword against a community that asked him to stop doing something they didn't like, he did it with an attitude that invited whatever pushback they could generate, and he did it after putting out in the public domain a lot of stuff that made normal people who would otherwise care little about his doings say a collective YUCK. If you're going to do that, you shouldn't be surprised when they in turn skip what's generally considered civil and decent, and make you as miserable as they legally can. It's icing on the cake when you've provided most of the facts used to condemn you as Facebook/Myspace posts.