Hey SBers!
I was reading a few posts here and there and people seem to take dive count serious around here. I mean how much can it really tell you. For all i can see, you cant judge a book by its cover.
A diver with 20 dives can be as good as one with 100 or more. The only reason is you would need more dives is for experience and seeing things go wrong and know how to avoid/fix them.
Some divers are just good and easily adapt and learn. Some OW divers have dove in varying vis from arms length to +30m, different currents and temperatures. However, why would be it safe to assume that a diver with 500 dives (where 400 of them are in the exact same site with similar conditions) has more experience.
Thought this would be an interesting discussion..
Lets see your thoughts
I was reading a few posts here and there and people seem to take dive count serious around here. I mean how much can it really tell you. For all i can see, you cant judge a book by its cover.
A diver with 20 dives can be as good as one with 100 or more. The only reason is you would need more dives is for experience and seeing things go wrong and know how to avoid/fix them.
Some divers are just good and easily adapt and learn. Some OW divers have dove in varying vis from arms length to +30m, different currents and temperatures. However, why would be it safe to assume that a diver with 500 dives (where 400 of them are in the exact same site with similar conditions) has more experience.
Thought this would be an interesting discussion..
Lets see your thoughts