pescador775
Contributor
- Messages
- 2,652
- Reaction score
- 14
More about "Grade E" criteria. The allowable "volatiles" is about the same as water, 25 ppm. Let's pick a typical volatile, toluene, and see how the CGA standard plays for purposes of filling an 100 cf SCUBA tank. Now, instead of two drops equivalent of water vapor we are considering the effect of about two drops (50 mg) of toluene placed inside a tank. Two drops of toluene is about the same amount which is dissolved in a teaspoon of wetsuit glue. Two drops placed in a wine glass should give you a pretty good buzz. I don't know what it would do at depth but the combined effect of high CO and toluene vapors would probably send the diver into a tailspin, and all perfectly legal under CGA Grade E standard. I'm not privy to the meetings and consults which lead to this standard or the rationale of the diving community in accepting it. At best, it is harmless to our community as most compressors probably do better, but not always. I've read about some incidents where compressors produced bad air and the problem was usually due to over heating or poor location. However, I don't think that the low end or worst case performance of compressors should be used as a guide to writing standards. I'm not sure what Grade E was originally intended for. I'll take a guess and submit that it is similar in concept to some OSHA standards, that is for low pressure compressors supplying air to men who work in sess pits, chemical storage tanks and the like. Somewhere along the line, people who work with high pressure air (firemen?) got into the act and influenced the CGA to make a change to the water criterion, and that is now down where it should be. However, we need a "divers' standard" for compressed air and not piggy back off of this CGA thing, whatever it is.