Um . . . . slow down there, cowboy. First off, I'm not even taking an opinion on this subject. I'm presenting both sides of the issue, with no editorialization. Second, dear, I'm a DM. You're among friends here. I promise you--no conspiracy theories are afoot. As an instructor, don't you want your students to read about how to decide when *they* will know they're ready to dive without a guide? As a DM, I'd like them to ask themselves this question, and I'd like them to have lots of informed opinions to help them make that decision. You're way off base, but I'm a good sport; no apology necessary. Cheers.
To everyone: If I didn't think this topic was controversial, I wouldn't have proposed it as an idea. Sure, I knew it was a can of worms! Bring it on. This is serious stuff. I want new divers to hear the opinions (no matter how varied) of experienced divers. So, please dish.
Well, actually, cowboy was many years and pounds ago. Some poor horse would look at me now and quiver in fear at the thought of me on it's back. It's "Captain" now.
No, actually, I don't want my students reading about when they are "too green to dive without an instructor or DM". Your premise (or at least the title of this thread) is that divers may come out of a scuba instructional course without the requisite skills to plan and execute a dive in conditions similar to the conditions in which they were certified. I'd much rather make sure that they are confident and know that they have the skills required than assume that the training agencies leave them so unprepared they can't even navigate? Who ever heard of certifying an Open Water diver and not providing them with some basic compass skills or natural navigation skills. And the instructors who posted on this thread about how "the reality is that we all know that divers come out of class unprepared to meet the demands of scuba diving independently" or however they said it, that's a cop out. If any instructor is turning out students that are unprepared to plan and execute a dive "in conditions similar to their training location" independently of an instructor or DM, they need to hang up their fins and find another hobby.
As I said earlier, I think a mentorship with a more qualified dive buddy is a fantastic way to build skills. And, with over 6,000 logged dives, I too dive with a guide/DM/Critter-pointer-outer when I'm in a new location. More than that, as an operator, I hire local knowledge when the operation goes to a new location. I pay attention to what that hired professional (usually a local Captain, sometimes a dive guide) tells and shows me, as I am paying them for their knowledge, but I'm not too "green" to execute the dive in this case, I'd just be wasting mine and my clients money and the local professional's time by not paying attention.
When you say you're a DM, I'd be interested in knowing what kind. Do you assist classes, which is very important, but a teaching assistant DM would have the viewpoint of having students who can't do anything for themselves, teaching them the skills needed to dive on their own (with the help of an instructor, of course), and turning them loose on the world. That's a far cry from being a dive leader or boat crew, where you receive these newly certified divers and show them the true wonders of the underwater world. If you are the latter, wouldn't you want your clients to come to you with the basic skills that we all learned (or were supposed to learn) when they present you with that temporary or plastic certification card that says that they are a diver? Wouldn't you want them to be able to kit themselves up without your input? Wouldn't you want them to have the confidence to know that, with a conditions/site briefing from you, including currents, visibility, landmarks, and unusual conditions they may encounter, that they can hop in, paddle around the bottom, see the 400 lb grouper behind the ledge, and come back to the boat without need of any intervention from you, except to check them back in, make sure they have air, and help them to their seat safely on a rocking boat? I know that's what I like to see.
I equate having a certification card to getting a drivers license or pilot's ticket. Is the new driver ready to race at LeMans? Not too likely. Is the new pilot ready to perform aerobatics? Again, probably not. Is that driver or pilot ready to hop in the car/plane and drive/fly from Kansas City to St. Louis? Sure they are. Will they be able to pull into a gas station/FBO and get a fillup? Sure they will. That's because their drivers ed teacher/CFI gave them the skills necessary to have the title "Driver/Pilot". Will they make mistakes? Probably. Will they have accidents? Some percentage will. Hopefully they are accidents that they will walk away from. Gee. Just like diving, the way the system is designed.
I'd love to see you write a slightly different kind of article. Instead of trying to tell divers how to decide if they are too green to dive on their own without the supervision of a DM or instructor, I'd like you to tell divers how to insist that they get quality training in the first place. I'd like you to give them the tools they need to pick a competent, reliable instructor who truly cares about the "diving career" of their student. I'd like you to tell them that if they don't feel confident to plan and execute a dive on their own after certification, than their instructor did them a disservice, and they need to go back to him/her and finish their training. Too many instructors get hung up on the "formula" of making a new diver. Tell them what you're going to tell them, tell them, tell them what you told them, go to the pool and learn 22 new skills, go to the ocean and demonstrate mastery of those skills, take a test, and voila, you're a diver. This formula is a recipe for disaster, not just for the student, but for the industry as a whole, for these certified divers may know how to perform certain skills, but they don't know HOW TO DIVE, because knowing how to dive takes more than mastery of a few skills. I can't tell you how many divers I know who tell me that their spouse took the course, but just doesn't feel comfortable in the water. Well, even I know enough to know that you can't make someone feel comfortable in the water. But if you have someone who is interested enough to learn, there is no reason for a good competent instructor not to give the time, effort, and skills to teach that person to be a diver, not just to master a skill set.
In closing, I don't think I'm way off base. By the title of this thread, you're making the assumption that there are divers out there that got out of a course with a card that still can't dive independently. By writing an article about it, you're legitimizing that stand. I think that's a dangerous path to follow, both for the individual diver and the industry as a whole. I think I'll reserve my apologies for when I see the finished product.