Sorry that I’m not really going to add anything to the original post here but I have to ask,
Firstly I’m guessing this set up isn’t uncommon in the US? I’m guessing the OP is US? I mean the running a BOV from a bailout? And is this for a specific need? (I realise to bailout) I understand the OP,s user is on a defender which I assume is using 3ltr onboard cylinders, with wing, bov, adv, and mav fed from it, and drysuit from its own cylinder right?
Because for me that set up would be good for somewhere between 5-6hrs in the water, granted I’m an ocean wrecker so not really a caver but I think your adding a few unnecessary failure points and complexity here by considering the bailout cylinder bov feed, which could outweigh the advantages,
Clearly you have a bov so there is no BO necklace to consider if your unfortunate enough to sample hypercapnia, your flicking a switch, granted depending on depth the 3ltr could be depleted quickly but a couple of breaths and bailout is the only way here, hypercapnia is only born from a badly packed scrubber or poor attitude to sofnolime quality or husbandry (how else could I word some of the practises) so with that in mind as long as you don’t over exert yourself the problem can have the “risk of” controlled to a minimum, after all any form of diving is really risk mitigation,
Please don’t take this post as I’m lambasting or pillorying anyone here, I just think it maybe worth taking a step back from the problem and reassessing, ie 3ltr 300bar onboards? ,, if you can fill to 300 ,,, and if your in a position to loose lead,
Or I could be completely off point here and this Bailout-Bov is to satisfy a particular need I’m not understanding in which case my points are off target.