I'm still puzzled about this rebreather. I have hundreds of rebreather dives on two different r/b's KISS and Inspo. But, I don't get the recreational rebreather. It is much more expensive than OC, it requires much more time pre and post dive, it requires more maintenance, and there is an increased workload during the dive. So why would one use CC for a recreational dive? What makes it worth the additional cost, time, and dive focus?
I think there are a few different ways to slice & dice it up;
1 - A rec diver can now dive the Yukon or Spiegel Grove for an hour or 2, at a time.
1a - Without bubbles
1b - Great for Underwater Photography
2 - Get's a diver/me closer to hammerhead sharks
3 - Great for a non-Tec diver
4 - It's NOT that much more expensive than a OC rig
5 - Hate to sound like I'm "on the bandwagon", but this IS the future of Rec Diving
6 - It's sexy looking (and we all know THAT sells), much like a Mac. It doesn't look like a "high school project" like most all other rebreathers, much like a Windows PC.
7 - It's simple, intuitive and it works. Much like a Mac.
8 - Again, this is a great tool for serious Underwater Photographers
9 - I'll preface this one with the fact that I do not work for Hollis or any other Scuba manufacturer, (bold statement spoiler). I'm willing to bet "dollars to doughnuts", that Hollis has already sold/pre-sold more of these units than the Top 3 traditional rebreather manufacturers, COMBINED, over the last 5 years worth of sales !!! Hmm, sounds like a new market segment, and a new revenue stream for scuba shops. Just sayin'
