dallaskincaid
Contributor
Attach kettle balls to the back of their BC?
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
I have read a few incidents of divers holding a panicked diver down to prevent them from DCS or a pulminary baratroma. I read about a few incidents on the Dan site about divers holding a panicked diver down and the diver drowned. I read of a recent incident where an instructor held a panicked student down and she suffered for it. If a panicked diver is out of air and racing for the surface it seems kind of stupid to hold them down to face the certainty of drowning over the possibility of DCS or a PB.
I can see many dangers with holding a panicked diver with air down. For one they may freak out and spit out there regulator and drown.
Is it ever a good idea to hold a panicked diver down?
1) Make contact with the ascending diver's BCD.
If a diver is making a fast, but otherwise safe, ascent - then you should slow them (not stop them).
If a diver is making a breath-holding ascent, you need to stop them (and get them breathing, before continuing the ascent).
May I say that safely catching a rapidly ascending diver can be harder than it seems? An instructor who is in direct care and control of a student may keep themselves in an optimum position to help a bolting student, but it doesn't always happen with buddies. I have caught a couple of rapidly ascending divers, but before I managed to, I thought I almost had them several times but they kept slipping out of my reach since they were going so fast. I kept trying though, since I was so close and eventually got them, but then had a slight headache myself after catching and slowing them down. In each case, I was right beside the diver when they took off, or just below them on a line that had to be held due to a swift current.
So how do you know--in the seconds you have to make a decision- if the rapidly ascending diver has air in their tank or not? Or does it make a differance?
(One was in Cozumel 10 years ago, and was a diver who was only allowed to dive with leaders but somehow became my buddy that day. She made a buoyant ascent from 40 feet or so at the end of a 90 foot dive, she wasn't panicked. She dragged me to about 10 feet before I managed to deflate her BC and hold her at the safety stop. We both had headaches, but otherwise ok.)
It's sometimes hard to know at that moment if they're holding their breath or not, depending on your position in relation to the victim. Especially if you're slightly below them and behind them.
(Four years ago, a diver who did not have enough training or experience to do a dive here in the St Lawrence river on the Vickery, which combines depth with a swift current, got a lung overexpansion injury and could not dive for the next 9 months. She was my buddy and for some unknown reason, she left the line that everyone was pulling themselves across the wreck with and went off the wreck where some tech divers were doing skills a bit deeper, looking comfortable at this point. I went with her, the current was strong and we were wasting gas and effort swimming against it, and I motioned her back to the line. Instead, she bolted diagonally to the up-line, working very hard, and then looking at me. I pulled myself along and then up the line at a reasonable speed, catching up with her. She went fast again, I caught her fins, got her to turn around and look, I signalled to slow down, and she bolted again. I caught her again and again, she even nodded, but took off again. She blew our deep stop, and I managed to hold her for only a few seconds there, and we did 3 minutes at 20 feet, rather than our planned 5 minutes. She eventually was ascending just slightly fast to the surface, however, she was holding her breath for some unknown reason. She was congested and felt her long-unheard-of asthma was acting up, causing discomfort after the dive, and was not administered oxygen. It persisted, she went to a dive medicine doctor, and was diagnosed with a lung over-expansion injury and got clearance to dive only shallow, easy dives 9 months later. Almost 4 years later, she has never been diving again. After my repeated attempts to catch up with her, I had a slight headache after, but otherwise ok.)
I know that you're a professional and have this all worked out, but in the spur of the moment, it's hard to catch an ascending diver's BC and to think to look at if they're holding their breath or not, as you're trying not to hurt yourself in the process of catching them and slowing them down.
Now that IS an absolutely horrific event, but its not quite the same.This is basically what happened in another thread: http://www.scubaboard.com/forums/accidents-incidents/449366-write-up-near-death-monterey.html
I call it "hold them down" because thats exactly what you do for some short ammount of time while making sure the ascent will be safe.Why do you choose hours when minutes will do the job nicely. I have to wonder why you choose to describe this as "hold them down" rather than "assist them to avoid the hazard". I feel it depicts a dangerous attitude. My wife's first scuba instructor told the class on the first day that all problems were solvable UW and he would stand on anybody's tank and hold them down if they attempt to surface. He put the OW class off badly enough that he was replaced before the next class. It is not the act as much as the attitude that I find alarming.
If someone wanted to subsequently sue me for that intervention, then so be it. ...
What you're missing is the context of "... is probably breath-holding".
If a diver is making a fast, but otherwise safe, ascent - then you should slow them (not stop them).
If a diver is making a breath-holding ascent, you need to stop them (and get them breathing, before continuing the ascent).
In the context of a breath-holding panicked ascent, holding you down is considerably safer than allowing you to proceed.
There could be increased risk to the panicked diver by the actions of the rescuer. Just because someone is a "rescuer" doesn't mean they are competant, or skilled, or use sound judgement. So in a hypothetical case where an instructor used unsound judgement in assisting a panicked student and caused them harm, I guess the instructor would be morally,legally,civily in the wrong?