justinthedeeps
Contributor
60mm is still your best lens
Don't get the 90mm, it's too frustrating to use underwaterdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7bf3f/7bf3ff1926fc246fd513840e76b0eaa8ba5539df" alt="Grinning squinting face :laughing: 😆"
The OM5 will do 90% of what the OM1 does underwater. Save $1000+
Unless you're doing Nauticam and already planning to part with up to $10k anyway.
Underwater you won't need the superburst modes or flying birds autofocus features that makes the OM1 $2k+
Yeah there are the two card slots and the viewfinder resolution, but that's not $1000 worth of difference.
Don't get the 90mm, it's too frustrating to use underwater
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7bf3f/7bf3ff1926fc246fd513840e76b0eaa8ba5539df" alt="Grinning squinting face :laughing: 😆"
The OM5 will do 90% of what the OM1 does underwater. Save $1000+
Unless you're doing Nauticam and already planning to part with up to $10k anyway.
Underwater you won't need the superburst modes or flying birds autofocus features that makes the OM1 $2k+
Yeah there are the two card slots and the viewfinder resolution, but that's not $1000 worth of difference.