They don't teach buddy breathing because it's DANGEROUS. Just like going to 200 fsw on air. Teaching something DANGEROUS is STUPID.MikeFerrara:the only reason they don't know how to do it is that it isn't usually taught.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
They don't teach buddy breathing because it's DANGEROUS. Just like going to 200 fsw on air. Teaching something DANGEROUS is STUPID.MikeFerrara:the only reason they don't know how to do it is that it isn't usually taught.
Being OOA is dangerous and trying to breath water is stupid but buddy breathing can save your life.NetDoc:They don't teach buddy breathing because it's DANGEROUS.
Just like going to 200 fsw on air. Teaching something DANGEROUS is STUPID.
Yes.tep:...
Enough analysis, I'm taking my soggy butt to the gym this afternoon. If nothing else, this has convinced me to lose that 20 pounds I've been kidding about for the past 5 years. SoCal diving is NOT the Kona diving I did last week, and that's just the way it is and I need to be in beter shape unless I want to be a statistic.
It's getting past your first year that's the issue. As endpoints I think we can see that you've got a probability of survivial that is <1 with no training, that rises some amount at 20 hours and reaches a value of 1 at 100 hours of training. The question is, what is your life and that of your loved ones worth? In terms of time and money invested in training? I submit that there is only one training scheme that has, over the course of more than a half century, proven itself to have a one year survivial probablity of 1. Can things be lopped off that scheme without reducing the survivial probability? Likely ... but I don't know what and would not want to risk it.tep:As far as I can tell, it's almost completely irrelevant if your course was PADI or NAUI or SSI or TDI or GUE, or if the course was 2 days or 2 weeks. Once you get past the first year, it's much more about whether or not you're in reasonable shape to go diving, as long as you don't dive WELL beyond your training.
Once training is completed ... you've got it.tep:So, don't be chubby, and don't go cave or wreck diving unless you're trained for it, and you'll be fine?
TheRedHead:How about incorporating the modified S-drill on descent? That way you know your alternate is working. What about better coverage of gas planning? Most OOA situations happen because of bad gas planning, not a catastrophic failure of the 1st stage o-ring. That's another one: check the o-ring while gearing up (which is usually taught in OW, at least it was in mine).
TheRedHead:Mike, I think it is something everyone should know, but I don't trust a causal buddy to not screw it up. But I wouldn't make a deco dive with a casual buddy either. I think the long hose and mod s-drill are a lot more important for the new open water diver.
Gilless:Well I only know one instructor that doesn't teach gas planning, the rest of the instructors I associate with do. We all teach dry breathing both regs on the surface and wet breathing both regs once in the water. So at least in my little circle of the world, I think we have that one covered.
O-rings are part of the standard pre-dive equipment check list
-s
Gilless:Well I only know one instructor that doesn't teach gas planning, the rest of the instructors I associate with do.
We all teach dry breathing both regs on the surface and wet breathing both regs once in the water. So at least in my little circle of the world, I think we have that one covered.
O-rings are part of the standard pre-dive equipment check list
-s
Buddy breathing has been taught, and continues to be taught, as part of a comprehensive program of training for more than fifty years. There has never been a single accident or injury either during such training or when people trained this way used buddy breathing in the field as one of many techniques that they had available in their bag of tricks. Loud rumbles that proclaim something as DANGEROUS!!!! are meaninglesss, all that matters is data, and the data says that effective instructors with adequate time can teach buddy breathing with zero risk to the student. When there is some contradictory data, then perhaps there could be a meaningful conversation, until then ... DANGEROUS!!! is just so much empty noise.NetDoc:They don't teach buddy breathing because it's DANGEROUS. Just like going to 200 fsw on air. Teaching something DANGEROUS is STUPID.