OP
Your right. But it achieved its purpose, and that was to fire up you guys up and get some intersting responses. I am not judging the course. I read the book, but havent taken the course. I am Naui certified and thats fine with me, I was just making the observation that the book, left a lot to be desired.
Which begs the question why not put "the good stuff" in the book? You still need to take a class to understand how to apply the theory.
Isn't GUE supposed to be interested in the "greater good"?
Which begs the question why not put "the good stuff" in the book? You still need to take a class to understand how to apply the theory.
Isn't GUE supposed to be interested in the "greater good"?