Giant Black Sea Bass - Casino Point

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

I saw this same fish on two dives at the park last Friday (8/5) while visiting Catalina. Scared the crap out of me at first actually because it was so huge! The pictures and videos really don't show how big it looked underwater. Definitely a treat for my first diving visit to southern California though.

Here are a few shots I took. Unfortunately, because I had my macro lens on my camera at the time, they're not all that great.


Catalina Aug 2011 38 by decidedlyodd, on Flickr


Catalina Aug 2011 39 by decidedlyodd, on Flickr


Catalina Aug 2011 49 by decidedlyodd, on Flickr
 
Have to disagree with Sam on his estimate. I've dived with lots of giant sea bass. I agree that it is difficult to estimate size underwater but this one was about 350 pounds. I'm 270 pounds, and it dwarfed me. We have only seen two fish estimated in the 600 lb range (and they might even be the same one). I am just over six feet tall. When a buddy tells me that a fish we were filming a few years ago exceeded the length of my body by at least a foot, that's a big fish.Dr. Charles Frederick Holder refers to 800 lb specimens in the waters off Mexico, although as best I can tell none of that size were ever seen in California waters.
 
Wow I guess there always has to be one out there to bring everyone down. Maybe I should have included my wife swimming next to it, she is 5'4 and it was as long as her, the video does not do it justice - it was a big fish. So why not let your fellow divers get excited about seeing something that big and gossip amongst ourselves on the size. Whether it was that big or not. If I'm going to trust anyones opinion it will be Dr Bills as he has more experience of Catalina sea life than anyone on this board.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drbill...

I agree on your estimate of its weight. However, wait until you see one in the 500-600 lb range! I've seen two of them.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Have either of you ever seen a GSB out of water? Have you ever weighed a GSB? A 100 pound one? a 200 pound one? a 300 pound one? I strongly suspect NO !



300- 400 500 and 600 pounds are exceptional GSB weights.. Next time you see a 600 pound GSB, please take a picture of two of him..

FYI the record catches are 563 pounds at Anacapa for hook and line, and 518 pounds at San Clemente for Spearfishing, which broke the previous record of 480 pounds set while diving from shore at Scotsmans Cove, now Reef point, Laguna Beach, OC.

I have personally had contact with a 345 pound GSB and can verify that is one big fish! Much much much bigger that that demonstrated in the video

So let's recognize that a 500 pound fish is very rare and a 600 pound fish is extremely rare and the fish pictured in the video was about 200 to maximumn of 250 pounds


Lets not get carried away size..even though it does matter



SDM


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
Last edited:
"Wow I guess there always has to be one out there to bring everyone down"
.....No back to the real world
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A five foot GSB is not a 300 pound fish! some where around the 200 pound plus size..

I recognize that according to drbill he began diving some time after God filled up the ocean, but neither of you were around when then GSB were being harvested by worm fishermen and spear fishermen therefore have no knowledge or experience to compare size and weight of a GSB underwater as compaired to land weight.

I have just a tad more experience up close and personal in BSB aka GSB unnderwater and certainly top side hanging from a tripod than you two modern late model tube suckers will or can ever have..

It's weight is about 200 maybe a tad more.

I have a bunch of B&W pictures of BSB (GSB) taken 40 or more years ago, but I do not have a scanner to transfer. if I did it would be interesting to have you two experts to estimate the weights of the fish as comparied to the actual weights.

The great F&G bio John Fitch spent his life studing the BSB (GSB)and published a number of articles and left a libaray of observational notes...may want to do a little research on John's work..He was and is the expert and the fountain head of BSB knowledge

FYI drbill, your basic instructor, Ron Merker had a world record for the BSB aka GSB.

sdm
 
Don't underestimate Sam. He does have tons of experience with these fish... and much of it back in the days when these fish were still legal to take. However, I will stand by my estimates on most fish as long as I have spent the time to look at them from a distance. When I'm filming close up, it is often difficult to estimate anything since one is not getting the "big picture."

Agree that it is hard to estimate weight underwater. I think many would be surprised to see the weights of the large bass brought up back in the late 1800s and early 1900s. These fish were quite big and often "just" in the 350 lb range.

However, Sam, you must consider that even when you began diving (significantly earlier than I did, especially in Catalina waters in 1969) the GSB populations had been heavily exploited by recreational anglers and commercial fishermen. The age/size distribution was undoubtedly skewed at that time, especially compared to the very early years (say the 1880s) when these fish became targeted. Harvest pressure on them even back in the 50s and 60s was significant, especially in view of their diminished populations at that time.

Of course keep in mind that Fitch often had to deal with headless GSB carcasses caught commercially rather than intact fish. That is one reason we have so little information about the age relationships within the species... the heads contained the otoliths that would allow us to age them accurately.

I find it interesting that the age structure of the population around Catalina seems to be highly skewed towards larger individuals. Although I see small GSB on occasion, it is rarer than the more mature fish. This may reflect the fact that we believe the fish come into the shallows to mate and the younger fish may not join the reproductive ones.

Sam, well aware that my certifying instructor (Ron) had the world record fish.
 
Fascinating video and info on the GSB, and I will be beyond tickled if I see one on my first trip to Catalina in just over a week!
 
Sam, I've acknowledged your experience with these fish underwater and topside prior to their being given protected status (in part due to the spearos of your era who helped further decimate them, including my instructor Ron, Bobby Meistrell [who now regrets what was done back then and protects these fish] and others).

However, I don't understand why you need to sound arrogant when stating your opinions.

I don't remember when you first started diving on SCUBA, but I believe it was in the early to mid 50s. Correct? While I was too young to do SCUBA then, I wasn't that far behind you (starting in 1961). My dives until 1969 were all in fresh water, so I did not have experience with the GSBs you did during that era. Unfortunately by the time I got to Catalina, they were a rarity.


A five foot GSB is not a 300 pound fish! some where around the 200 pound plus size..

I would certainly agree if this were a 5 ft fish. My estimate of its length (as well as that of the numerous local instructors who saw it as well) was that this fish was bigger than that and certainly in the 350 lb category.


I recognize that according to drbill he began diving some time after God filled up the ocean, but neither of you were around when then GSB were being harvested by worm fishermen and spear fishermen therefore have no knowledge or experience to compare size and weight of a GSB underwater as compaired to land weight.

I merely state the facts as to when I began diving. I am too young to match your experience yet, but I see no reason for you to make such a comment just because you've been SCUBA diving longer than I have.

I have just a tad more experience up close and personal in BSB aka GSB unnderwater and certainly top side hanging from a tripod than you two modern late model tube suckers will or can ever have..

Yes, you have. And it was the divers in your era who helped bring these fish to near regional extinction. Your reference to "late model tube suckers" is just one example of the arrogance I find in some of your statements.

I have a bunch of B&W pictures of BSB (GSB) taken 40 or more years ago, but I do not have a scanner to transfer. if I did it would be interesting to have you two experts to estimate the weights of the fish as comparied to the actual weights.

And I have, or have access to, a number of pictures of GSB taken back in the 1890s, early 1900s on up to the 1950s. As I've stated in my earlier post, you are correct in that it is difficult to estimate actual weight when seeing these fish underwater. But please don't belittle the experience of others if you have not had directly observation of the fish in question.

The great F&G bio John Fitch spent his life studing the BSB (GSB)and published a number of articles and left a libaray of observational notes...may want to do a little research on John's work..He was and is the expert and the fountain head of BSB knowledge

Certainly John did a lot of great pioneering work on the GSB. However, his research was somewhat incomplete since he rarely had access to the otoliths in the head (the heads being cut off by commercial fishers bringing in their catches) and often not even the digestive system (since the entrails were usually discarded as well).

FYI drbill, your basic instructor, Ron Merker had a world record for the BSB aka GSB.

sdm

And you know I know that since we've discussed it previously.

Just because you started diving a long time ago, and certainly have had experiences we all wish we had as well, does not necessarily make you an expert on current day conditions. I rarely claim expertise despite nearly 50 years of diving history and a Ph.D. in marine ecology. There are so many things I don't know about the sea, and don't claim to. It is those very things that draw me back time and time again.

I remember one highly recognized fish expert at a university stated that rock wrasse are rarely cleaners. I contacted that individual with pictures showing rock wrasse as regular cleaners, but largely specializing on halfmoon (occasionally other fish including garibaldi). He was quite surprised even though he had been studying fish about as long as I'd been diving.

Sam, although people seem to see me as some sort of guru, they also know that I am a pretty humble person... especially about things I know little about. I'm always willing to HELP others by sharing what I do know, and as a scientist I am pretty open to new information that comes in from a newly certified diver, an angler or other source that some might not be so wiolling to listen to.

I certainly welcome information from your many years of experience, but it would be nice if it were delivered with less arrogance just because someone contradicted your opinion on a fish you have not even seen.
 
thnx for posting
 
That is a nice fish, thanks for posting it. I hope someone sees it again and includes something in the shot to compare the size to.
 

Back
Top Bottom