Four who died were not trained for Delta P - Trinidad and Tobago

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

DandyDon

Umbraphile
ScubaBoard Supporter
Messages
54,118
Reaction score
8,268
Location
One kilometer high on the Texas Central Plains
# of dives
500 - 999
The original incident thread...

The four divers who lost their lives while trapped in a pipeline belonging to the Paria Fuel Trading Company on February 25, 2022, were not trained or properly equipped to handle emergencies such as a Delta P event.

That’s according to the Lead Counsel of the Commission of Enquiry into the tragic circumstances surrounding the incident, Ramesh Lawrence Maharaj, who spoke at the first hearing into the incident on Monday (November 21).

Maharaj was at the time reading from the report commissioned by the Occupational Safety and Health Agency (OSHA) from Texas-based firm, the Association of Diving Contractors International Inc (ADCI).

Maharaj noted that the report was dated July 29, 2022, and was signed by ADCI’s executive director, Phil Newsome, who has experience as a commercial diver and a diving instructor.

Maharaj pointed out that Newsome also specialises in Delta P investigations as he serves as part of the company’s Delta-P task force.

Maharaj explained that the report defines Delta P as a differential pressure- the difference in pressure between any two points in an open or closed system that can result in a fluid flow, creating a hazard to the diver.

He said the report also assessed the operational readiness and safety management of LMCS as well as the failure of Paria officials and the failure of the Trinidad and Tobago Coast Guard to respond to the emergency and effect a rescue operation.

“The findings of the report included the following: only two members of the dive team were in possession of commercial diving certification. The remainder of the dive team was in possession of recreational scuba certification.”

Maharaj said the report highlighted that scuba certification was not intended or designed to prepare divers for commercial diving.

He said the diving personnel, therefore, were inadequately trained for commercial diving, specifically to perform an operation that involves differential pressure hazards.

He said the report also noted that the contractor (LMCS) failed to manage safety with respect to dealing with differential pressure hazards.

Maharaj said the operations and safety observations concerning the contractor and the facility operator also did not include umbilical management as the dive operation was performed on scuba.

“Scuba diving was absolutely not the tool for the job and the type of operation and the location offshore from the main facility.”

Maharaj said the report highlighted that it was apparent that no planning, mitigation plan, emergency response plan, pre-dive checks and verifications, as well as access during the dive took into account the potential for a Delta P hazard.

“The testimony of Christopher Boodram (lone survivor) outlines the failure of both Paria officials and the Coast Guard to authorise the timely rescue of the other four divers which ultimately made it a recovery operation.”

On Monday, video and audio of the last words uttered by divers Fyzal Kurban, Kazim Ali Jr, Rishi Nagassar and Yusuf Henry were played before the panel, chaired by Jerome Lynch, QC.

Experts also noted that the men may have been alive for several days after the incident.

Up to Monday Lynch noted that Paria had not yet submitted witness statements, however he said they expect a report from the company by Easter 2023.
 
I'm a little curious why OSHA is involved. OSHA is an USA regulatory agency, whereas occurred in another tiny country.
 
I'm a little curious why OSHA is involved. OSHA is an USA regulatory agency, whereas occurred in another tiny country.
Might be a US company?
 
Might be a US company?
I'm not a lawyer, but that jurisdiction seems dubious.

OSHA doesn't even have jurisdiction over the entire US, if the following is correct and I'm reading this correctly:


edit: Although I should be careful when opening the can-of-worms of boring legal-topics.
 
I'm reading it not as an OSHA compliance violation report, but someone using ADCI as an expert witness to state that what they were doing was in no way in accordance with accepted standards. So either as part of a lawsuit, or prepping for a lawsuit. It does look like there is a formal investigation going on, so it makes sense that they would seek out external experts in the field.


After watching this it looks like a different type of accident than I was thinking. I was imagining the divers getting sucked into a pipe that they were swimming around. It looks like they actually had a habitat around the pipe, and the divers were sucked into the pipe dry, then survived for 24 to 75 hours after getting trapped.

Horrible way to go.
 
I'm reading it not as an OSHA compliance violation report, but someone using ADCI as an expert witness...
That makes sense.

After watching this it looks like a different type of accident than I was thinking.
It also makes more sense why there was heavy criticism about the failure-to-rescue. Theoretically, there was plenty of time to rescue all or nearly all of the workers, even considering it's a tiny and poor country. Even if that country didn't have the resources, they certainly could have called up others to assist.
 
My understanding OSHA was commissioned by ADCI for the report. So more of consulting not regulatory.
 
My understanding OSHA was commissioned by ADCI for the report. So more of consulting not regulatory.

Probably was asked by the host country to investigate because they lacked the expertise. The NTSB does the same for smaller countries in the American sphere of influence.
 
The original incident thread...

I’m totally against the use of scuba gear during commercial diving operation, but in this case the use of scuba diving equipment has nothing to do with this accident.
Here, the divers were working inside a hyperbaric habitat that was continuously ventilated with fresh air and was equipped with light, communication and a CCTV which allowed the surface to see what happened inside the chamber. When working inside such a dry chamber it is the habit (except if you have only a few minutes to work or if you’re working inside a toxic atmosphere) to remove your diving gear which permits to work more comfortably (for sometimes several hours).
So the ones that suggest that these divers should have wear a diving helmet or a band mask are people that have never done such type of work because I invite them to wear such an equipment at the surface during let’s say just one hour.
And if these divers had indeed worked with a supplied diving equipment (umbilical + helmet or band mask) inside the hyperbaric habitat like some have suggested in their report then most probably the five of them would have died.
The public hearings into the investigation of this incident are now closed and the final report is expected to be released in April. But thanks to the hearings as well as the numerous documents that were published on this occasion, we can already realize that the main cause of this dramatic incident is due to ignorance by ALL the parties concerned (diving company/ divers/ customer) of this type of danger.
During that incident, Christopher Boodram, Fysal Kurban, Rishi Nagassar, Yusuf Henry and Kasim Ali jr, were sucked into a pipeline by a violent delta P. About two hours after the incident, Christopher managed to come back at the top of the riser on his own.
For the other four divers this unfortunately was not the case because they died on the spot a few hours later, following a very PISS-POOR POST INCIDENT MANEGEMENT.
Yet it would have taken very little for them, too, to more than likely be recovered alive from that pipeline.

Fate made it otherwise.

RIP dear colleagues.
 

Back
Top Bottom